Poll

Which one?

Nokia Lumia 900
HTC Titan II

Author Topic: HTC Titan II or Nokia Lumia 900?  (Read 1016 times)

« Last Edit: June 15, 2012, 09:13:08 PM by _Rave_ »

People actually buy Windows phones...?

My vast knowledge of cellphones is only in handy when it comes to Android, sorry pal. Id go with the HTC though.

EDIT: And I voted for the wrong phone. Oops.


Obv, you should get the droid.

Obv, you should get the droid.
Neither one of those are droids


Are those just the 2 you think you want or your only options? Because windows phones are totes gay. IF I had AT&T I'd get an iphone I just like iphones.

Are you guys handicapped?  Obviously I am only interested in Windows Phones, and I realize that they aren't the most popular which is exactly why I provided you with the goddamn specs.

The Titan II has an insane 16MP camera and a very good front facing camera.  The Nokia has AMOLED and gorilla glass, while the HTC has SLCD and normal glass.

The nokia is still indestructible, a guy used the screen to hammer a nail into a piece of wood.

Are those just the 2 you think you want or your only options? Because windows phones are totes gay. IF I had AT&T I'd get an iphone I just like iphones.
iphones suck.  additionally, I use zune so a windows phone is my best option.

Lumia, simply because I'm still not sure I trust HTC.

Looks like it got a better rating from that site anyway. Though you've probably already made up your mind on which to get, usually the deciding factor is how it looks.

iphones suck.  additionally, I use zune

*giggles*

Looked this time
Titan


Titan II if you really want that 16 MP camera.  As someone with an AT&T Samsung Galaxy S2 and an 8 MP camera, like the Lumia 900 does, an 8 MP camera is pretty great itself.  I use my phone as a webcam for Skype too.

If the Lumia 900 is more physically durable, then go for it.  Considering that you've fully decided that you want WP7 on your phone, the only flaw I'm seeing for the Titan II is that it uses WP7 (which obviously isn't a flaw, it's just a small market share in comparison to the two giants Android and iOS), while the Lumia 900 is reported to have some minor problems...

Still, I'd say Lumia 900 and now I wish I could revote.

Titan II if you really want that 16 MP camera.  As someone with an AT&T Samsung Galaxy S2 and an 8 MP camera, like the Lumia 900 does, an 8 MP camera is pretty great itself.  I use my phone as a webcam for Skype too.

If the Lumia 900 is more physically durable, then go for it.  Considering that you've fully decided that you want WP7 on your phone, the only flaw I'm seeing for the Titan II is that it uses WP7 (which obviously isn't a flaw, it's just a small market share in comparison to the two giants Android and iOS), while the Lumia 900 is reported to have some minor problems...

Still, I'd say Lumia 900 and now I wish I could revote.
See this is the kind of response I was looking for.

The camera isn't incredibly important, but it's a nice addition in my opinion.  Those flaws don't seem awful, though still irritating.

The only other thing worth mentioning is that while the two phones are the same size, the Titan II is almost 1/2 inch bigger diagonally.

On a side note, I don't loving understand Microsoft.  Why would they limit the screen res to 480x800?  Why would they force manufacturers to only support single core processors?  Why do they feel the need to strangle their partners, when they could be making incredible handsets?  It annoys me to no end, such an amazing UI on an average-at-best device.

id rather play phoneball with something that wont break
lumia 900

Am I the only one who doesn't get a hard-on for getting the latest and greatest phone?

I figure if my phone can call people then I'm happy.