Author Topic: I compare Battlefield 3 and Call of Duty  (Read 2322 times)

apples and loving oranges

being a bf3 fanboy and hating cod and viceversa doesnt make you cool

Battlefield 3 = Strategy based shooter (but played like call of duty because nobody knows how to be a team player)

Call of Duty = Arcade based shooter (Has other team based gamemodes but is still call of duty)


apples and loving oranges
Both are FPS games that are team based, they're both apples. You can compare these two games.

Except that arcade based shooters are supposed to be balanced and hacker-free.

Both are FPS games that are team based, they're both apples. You can compare these two games.
lol

so youre saying i can compare serious sam 3 to tribes ascend

cod sucking is mostly the community's fault but the formula gets old

when blackops 2 comes out I'll be playing warfighter and not caring lol

lol

so youre saying i can compare serious sam 3 to tribes ascend
you're saying that cod doesn't suck?

you're saying that cod doesn't suck?
considering how delicious and healthy it is, I don't see why cod would suck
it's part of a balanced diet

I like both games and own both games because I'm not some poor battlecigarette/codcigarette that hate on cod/battlefield because he can't afford both

i was aware that cod was a banana

cod sucking is mostly the community's fault but the formula gets old

when blackops 2 comes out I'll be playing warfighter and not caring lol
the formula is being used by ea now
warfighter looks exactly like battlefield, if not even more boring

Battlefield.
Boring.
hahaohwow.jpg.
I can always duck behind a corner and regen health in 2 sec- oh, wait.