Author Topic: Can the Blockland Forums pass the Fizz Buzz test?  (Read 2587 times)

Code: [Select]
1 2 Fizz 4 Buzz Fizz 7 8 Fizz Buzz 11 Fizz 13 14 Fizzbuzz 16 17 Fizz 19 Buzz Fizz 22 23 Fizz Buzz 26 Fizz 28 29 Fizzbuzz 31 32 Fizz 34 Buzz Fizz 37 38 Fizz Buzz 41 Fizz 43 44 Fizzbuzz 46 47 Fizz 49 Buzz Fizz 52 53 Fizz Buzz 56 Fizz 58 59 Fizzbuzz 61 62 Fizz 64 Buzz Fizz 67 68 Fizz Buzz 71 Fizz 73 74 Fizzbuzz 76 77 Fizz 79 Buzz Fizz 82 83 Fizz Buzz 86 Fizz 88 89 Fizzbuzz 91 92 Fizz 94 Buzz Fizz 97 98 Fizz Buzz
I did it. Totally not copied from quoting Yosher.

Code: [Select]
1 2 Fizz 4 Buzz Fizz 7 8 Fizz Buzz 11 Fizz 13 14 Fizzbuzz 16 17 Fizz 19 Buzz Fizz 22 23 Fizz Buzz 26 Fizz 28 29 Fizzbuzz 31 32 Fizz 34 Buzz Fizz 37 38 Fizz Buzz 41 Fizz 43 44 Fizzbuzz 46 47 Fizz 49 Buzz Fizz 52 53 Fizz Buzz 56 Fizz 58 59 Fizzbuzz 61 62 Fizz 64 Buzz Fizz 67 68 Fizz Buzz 71 Fizz 73 74 Fizzbuzz 76 77 Fizz 79 Buzz Fizz 82 83 Fizz Buzz 86 Fizz 88 89 Fizzbuzz 91 92 Fizz 94 Buzz Fizz 97 98 Fizz Buzz
I did it. Totally not copied from quoting Yosher.
maybe if you read the topic you can do it correctly

Code: [Select]
1 2 Fizz 4 Buzz Fizz 7 8 Fizz Buzz 11 Fizz 13 14 Fizzbuzz 16 17 Fizz 19 Buzz Fizz 22 23 Fizz Buzz 26 Fizz 28 29 Fizzbuzz 31 32 Fizz 34 Buzz Fizz 37 38 Fizz Buzz 41 Fizz 43 44 Fizzbuzz 46 47 Fizz 49 Buzz Fizz 52 53 Fizz Buzz 56 Fizz 58 59 Fizzbuzz 61 62 Fizz 64 Buzz Fizz 67 68 Fizz Buzz 71 Fizz 73 74 Fizzbuzz 76 77 Fizz 79 Buzz Fizz 82 83 Fizz Buzz 86 Fizz 88 89 Fizzbuzz 91 92 Fizz 94 Buzz Fizz 97 98 Fizz Buzz
I did it. Totally not copied from quoting Yosher.

you're doing it wrong

damnit freeze

Shorter version:
Code: (Python) [Select]
for i in range(1, 101):
    print ((i % 3 == 0 and "Fizz") + (i % 5 == 0 and "Buzz")) or i

Code: [Select]
function FizzBuzz()
{
for(%a=1; %a <= 100; %a++)
echo((%a % 3 == 0) ? ((%a % 5 == 0) ? "FizzBuzz" : "Fizz") : ((%a % 5 == 0) ? "Buzz" : %a));
}

I remember playing this game in primary school

about as much of a contribution as an angry kid that writes in COBOL, yeah
COBOL is still used in legacy applications in telecommunications

VB.NET is used virtually nowhere outside of runescape bots

COBOL is still used in legacy applications in telecommunications

VB.NET is used virtually nowhere outside of runescape bots
Wouldn't RS-bots logically be made in a JVM language?

Wouldn't RS-bots logically be made in a JVM language?
wouldn't your ass logically be made with your face?

(because your face is your ass, get it)

wouldn't your ass logically be made with your face?

(because your face is your ass, get it)
Calm down there, COBOL boy.

What pissed you off?


Code: [Select]
$top = 100;
$fiz = 0; $buz = 0; $fizbuz = 0;
for($count = 1; $count <= $top; $count++) {
$dfb = 0;
if($count % 3 == 0) { print "Fizz"; $dfb++; $fiz++ }
if($count % 5 == 0) { print "Buzz"; $dfb++; $buz++ }
if($dfb == 2) { $fizbuz++; $fiz--; $buz-- }
if(!$dfb) { print $count }
print " ";
}
print "\n\n".$fiz." fizzes, ".$buz." buzzes, ".$fizbuz." fizbuzzes."

Fizzbuzz in perl. My first perl program.

Edit again: I have nothing better to do right now, so I made it print how many fizzes, buzzes, and fizzbuzzes there are. I counted and it's right.
« Last Edit: July 15, 2012, 09:24:55 PM by Club559 »

Here it is in php too;
http://anyspieceofinter.net/fizzbuzz.php

Code: [Select]
<?

function FizzBuzz($top) {

for($i = 1;$i <= $top;$i++) {

if($i % 3 == 0 && $i % 5 == 0) {

echo $i . ': FizzBuzz';

}

elseif($i % 3 == 0) {

echo $i . ': Fizz';

}

elseif($i % 5 == 0) {

echo $i . ': Buzz';

}

else {

echo $i;

}

echo '<br/>';

}

}

FizzBuzz(100);

?>


Am i doing it right?
Code: [Select]
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>

int main (int argc, const char * argv[])
{

    for ( int i = 1; i <100 ; i++) {
        
        if (i % 15 == 0) {
            NSLog(@"Fizzbuzz %i", i);
        } else if (i % 3 == 0) {
            NSLog(@"Fizz %i", i);
        } else if (i % 5 == 0) {
            NSLog(@"Buzz %i", i);
        } else {
            NSLog(@"%i", i);
        }
        
    }
    
    return 0;
}
Objective C
« Last Edit: July 16, 2012, 09:23:44 AM by Eeposs »