How is it incorrect? The kool kids klub has a good side and bad side. Sure, the entirety of it is foul and evil but there are probably groups far less radical than the type who blow up buildings and commit other acts of terrorism. Thus by extension they are better than their brethren who would maim or kill in the name of their cause.
Doesn't change the fact the kool kids klub is a brilliant example of intolerance, but technically they are the 'good' side who would rather be political than violent.
But, again, we're comparing a hate group to a group advocating civil rights. I figured it was implied I was solely speaking on that subject but I can see how it turned out a little vague; I don't consider hate groups to be on the same page as those trying to actively help people achieve equality.
it appears you've mistaken what I was trying to say
I didn't mean to call your excerpt incorrect
just that the kool kids klub is an exclusion to that (but not in your eyes, as I'm now rereading your last paragraph)
I can see where you're coming from, but I don't see why you'd compare a hategroup to terrorist organisations
hategroups dislike and mistreat
certain groups
terrorist organisations destroy everything and everyone indiscriminately to achieve a goal
that seems like more of a stretch of an brown townogy than the hategroup :: feminist group brown townogy
