Author Topic: Feminism.org hijacking -- The site is back.  (Read 10787 times)

Why start a new thread when an existing one works fine? The discussion emerged naturally out of the posts in the thread. Threads do this. You are really getting worked up over nothing. Forums do this. Conversations do this in real life too (assuming you've had them).
Of course the existing thread works fine. It's served it's purpose, and it should have died. Instead you come in here and stir up an argument about something that has nothing to do with OP

Also, resulting to personal attacks? Are you really getting that desperate?

Of course the existing thread works fine. It's served it's purpose, and it should have died. Instead you come in here and stir up an argument about something that has nothing to do with OP
It's still going, be quiet.

Feminism is huge point in OP.

Quote from: Eluxsam's mind
THIS IS RIDICULOUS REAL MEN WOULD NEVER CHANGE THE TOPIC OF DISCUSSION WEDGE YOU MUST ME A WOMAN BECAUSE YOU'RE SO FICKLE OH GOD WHY DID SHE LEAVE ME

It's still going, be quiet.
Yeah, you're right, it is still going. But my point is that what's being discussed right now has absolutely nothing to do with the thread's original purpose.



Great argument.


Of course the existing thread works fine. It's served it's purpose, and it should have died. Instead you come in here and stir up an argument about something that has nothing to do with OP

Also, resulting to personal attacks? Are you really getting that desperate?
Actually I thought the personal attacks were fun and if you don't mind I'm going to continue them. If you'd like to view it as desperation you're welcome to it, I don't mind.

Also I had to adblock your avatar because I can't take anybody with a creepbear avatar seriously. Sorry.

Actually I thought the personal attacks were fun and if you don't mind I'm going to continue them. If you'd like to view it as desperation you're welcome to it, I don't mind.

Also I had to adblock your avatar because I can't take anybody with a creepbear avatar seriously. Sorry.
Okay this is pathetic. You're so desperate you can't even directly make good points, so instead you try to win it by taking it personally.

Of course the existing thread works fine. It's served it's purpose, and it should have died. Instead you come in here and stir up an argument about something that has nothing to do with OP

Unless the thread began as an argument about what to talk about, you're not doing a very good job of either re-railing it or letting it die

Okay this is pathetic. You're so desperate you can't even directly make good points, so instead you try to win it by taking it personally.
*Excuse me*, but who was the one who called my views on feminism handicapped? Pot, kettle, black. I don't mind the personal attacks though, keep them coming. I especially like the parts where you call me "desperate." See, I don't have a problem teasing arguments out around attacks.

If you'd like me to, I can start putting my personal attacks in a separate paragraph and my points in another for your viewing pleasure.

But really, I'm intrigued about my handicapped feminism views. Why do you think they're handicapped?

If a war came up that required conscription most of the feminist women would want to revert back to a low status to avoid combat.

*Excuse me*, but who was the one who called my views on feminism handicapped? Pot, kettle, black. I don't mind the personal attacks though, keep them coming. I especially like the parts where you call me "desperate." See, I don't have a problem teasing arguments out around attacks.

If you'd like me to, I can start putting my personal attacks in a separate paragraph and my points in another for your viewing pleasure.

But really, I'm intrigued about my handicapped feminism views. Why do you think they're handicapped?
I was never talking about your feminism views. I agreed with someone in the topic and you attacked me. But of course, you're just going to keep trying to redirect the argument, so attempting to converse with you intelligently is out the window.

If a war came up that required conscription most of the feminist women would want to revert back to a low status to avoid combat.

It's incredibly disrespectful to assume that they would willingly lower their social status.  Why?  Because that's a woman's natural place?  Because they're used to it?
Anyway, plenty of countries already do have required national service for both genders.  Get with the times.

If a war came up that required conscription most of the feminist women would want to revert back to a low status to avoid combat.
You will find that a) most men do not want to be conscripted either, and b) there are many women who are interested in military careers.

I was never talking about your feminism views. I agreed with someone in the topic and you attacked me. But of course, you're just going to keep trying to redirect the argument, so I assume trying to converse with you intelligently is out the window.
I would love to converse with you intelligently but you have not given me a single argument to debate, all you've done is whined about how I've ruined the thread while in every post I've insisted that I haven't and explained why. Meanwhile there's people here trying to debate feminism. Good show.

There was a point in time where women almost achieved equal rights, but then the Vietnam War came and many women didn't want to go to Vietnam to fight with the men. Yes there were women serving in Vietnam, but not in combat roles.

You will find that a) most men do not want to be conscripted either, and b) there are many women who are interested in military careers.
A. Yes I am sure. B. I am aware of. There are many women who can talk the the talk, but can't walk the walk.

Now don't get me wrong. I support equal rights. What I don't support is giving women special treatment. If a women wants to do a mans job she better be able to preform the work a man can do also well as have the same rules and expectations as a man would. If they are some sort of eastern europe heavy steriod-estrogen user, well good for them.