Feminism.org hijacking -- The site is back.

[Harm94]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=geQyrBGS_60&NR=1

[Ad Bot]

[Eluxsam]

So he uses a single example of something that happened in the media as an example to discredit an entire movement when the very depictions of mutilation he described probably occur in some flash video on newgrounds. If that's seriously his argument then he's about as good as arguing as the average Blockland member. I don't know why he deserves the title the Amazing Atheist unless he chose it ironically and this is some big parody thing that I'm just not in on.
Yeah, well, sorry, but you quoted him and said "This SO MUCH." I call it like I see it. You also derailed the thread by talking about something other than the feminism.org hijacking.
What country do you live in because I have traveled all over the US and seen plenty of men doing these jobs too.

So calling someone an idiot out of the blue is perfectly okay and innocen?

[Wedge]

So calling someone an idiot out of the blue is okay?

Nope, but it sure was fun.

Is that it then?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=geQyrBGS_60&NR=1

Again, he pulls ONE post from a SINGLE person and then uses that to justify something or other that clearly over reaches the bounds of his evidence, I wouldn't know because I couldn't listen to the video because 1) the list was dumb, 2) the amazing atheist is dumb.

[Uncle Bengs]

as a white, christian, male, all these equal rights movements do not apply or benefit me, therefore i am against them. they are all trying to take power instead of making it equal, proof of this is that they are always limiting the rights of the opposites, making them more powerful in society. they also call me names when i tell them why i hate them. rude.

[Eluxsam]

Nope, but it sure was fun.

Is that it then?

So you were trolling me?

[Dusty12]

Wedge, good luck to you. I tried to argue against these stupid 'feminational socialist' generalizations in the thread before this and I was met with supreme stonewalling. I just don't think you're going to get it through their heads.

[Garnavis]

So equally to you is where a woman can do anything a man could, only less while still having protection from men? Or is it something else. Since almost everything you said is about me "being wrong and a typical opressing", tell what this man-woman equality thing is to you.

To me, equality is everyone having an equal chance regardless of their gender (/race/creed/etc) and not having to deal with the assumption that they inherently can or cannot perform in a given area based on their gender (/race/creed/etc), and not being judged for their decision to do so.  Your claims that women can't cut the mustard because they're women is harmful to that equality and you should reconsider.

Also, the Amazing Atheist makes me throw up in my mouth, so thanks for that

[Harm94]

Wedge, good luck to you. I tried to argue against these stupid 'feminational socialist' generalizations in the thread before this and I was met with supreme stonewalling. I just don't think you're going to get it through their heads.

I have an idea. Lets have a woman, no a feminist tell us everything what there movement wants to accomplish and what equality is to them with every detail about it.

[Menen]

In dis Thred: Wedge defends feminists.

[Wedge]

as a white, christian, male, all these equal rights movements do not apply or benefit me, therefore i am against them. they are all trying to take power instead of making it equal, proof of this is that they are always limiting the rights of the opposites, making them more powerful in society. they also call me names when i tell them why i hate them. rude.

1. They do benefit you.
2. They don't take power.
3. They don't limit the rights of opposites.
4. Sorry if I called you names but you probably deserved it.

So you were trolling me?

No, see, trolling would be calling you an idiot to get you mad.

I called you an idiot because I felt you deserved it. Here's what it looked like from my point of view: you came into the thread randomly, without having posted much in it before, quoted a guy who I already pointed out was clearly wrong and thereby must have not read anything I posted, and just said "this," which is possibly the most useless thing you could post in a thread next to "first," and gets you banned in a lot of places (but not here).

If all you want is an apology then yeah, I'm sorry for saying mean things to you, I shouldn't have done that.

[Uncle Bengs]

In dis Thred: Wedge defends feminists.

because they are women (and therefore weak physically and mentally) they need to be defended by a man

[Wedge]

I have an idea. Lets have a woman, no a feminist tell us everything what there movement wants to accomplish and what equality is to them with every detail about it.

The fact that you think you have to go out and find a woman to find a feminist clearly proves that you have no understand of what the movement is about, because otherwise you would have realized you had already found one. If you want to know what the movement is about in every detail why don't you try opening a book.

because they are women (and therefore weak physically and mentally) they need to be defended by a man

Nice try but that's not what a feminist is. You should go read a book too.

[Eluxsam]

In dis Thred: Wedge defends feminists.

IDT

If all you want is an apology then yeah, I'm sorry for saying mean things to you, I shouldn't have done that.

That's good enough for me.

[DnaUnstable]

"Some awful women on a stuffty talk show said some bad things, therefore all feminism is invalid!"
-snip-

I've actually never even been on the site.

[Menen]

I think Wedge is secretly a lady.

Or one of those gay guys that are feminists which I cant even begin to understand.