Your views about something can't be incorrect if they can't be proven right or wrong.
By saying "the Bible says" and then ranting off on something that isn't what the Bible says, you are then incorrect. It's rather universal logic in any case, so yes, he was inaccurate.
Of course, many of you may not get the exact point of view, but if, for instance, someone says the Hunger Games series is a book series written about flying purple hippos with rocket engines in their ass because they believe it to be true, it means they are accurate? No. Most of us know what the Hunger Games series is about. But one can't wave off the fact that both are wrong, because the text of Hunger Games represents an oppressive government forcing children to fight to the death in a yearly event that is televised nationally.
It is the same way with the Bible; we know it exists, because some of us have seen and felt it. We have observed that it physically exists. For the few of us who have also read the text itself, we know that it is not about space snakes with tentacles made out of rags. I have read the Bible, and its text does not say what JesusLover said, therefore I have observed the text first-hand and represent what it says. Any belief according to a source
from the Bible that does not align with the text taken
from the Bible is wrong.
