Not what im getting at.
Im getting at Stoner Argument #1 "ITS NATURAL SO ITS GOOD FOR YOU"
It isnt Natural, and they refuse to realize that. You know what else is Natrual? Tobacco.
This is the age-old argument for stupid stoners is what you should had said.
If a person has half of a brain cell, they realize that smoking marijuana is, yes, harmful to your lungs, but in a different way. It's not bad for you in the same way that cigarettes are bad. Cigarettes tar up your lungs and make them all black and icky. Marijuana smoke just weakens them. It won't give you lung cancer, actually, on the contrary, it's been proven that smoking pot helps reduce your risk for lung cancer.
It's 100% natural. Have you ever seen tobacco when it's grown? No, probably not. Tobacco is a lettuce-like plant that grows out of the ground, they dry it up, spray it with chemicals to help it ignite easily, burn evenly and flavorings.
Marijuana on the other hand, here's the "scientific" process of marijuana leaving the growing room and entering your lungs;
You cut the buds off of the plant.
You put the buds in a paper bag or hang them out to dry
You grind the buds.
You smoke.
There's no chemical additives, there's no extra stuff that you have to worry about.
So let me loving settle this argument for both of you because you both sound stupid as forget;
Yes, marijuana could technically be detrimental for your health, but only if you already have existing complications like asthma. There's literally nothing bad that can happen from you smoking weed besides getting too baked and having a bad trip and then sleeping.
Find me a single legitimate medical study (from the last decade) of how marijuana is actually bad for you, and I'll agree with you, but until then you sound like a 1950's propaganda video.
