Getting perma banned from Lugnuts Zombies in the Bluzone

[Tomcat]

actually yeah the system you suggested works if it banned you.

as in Sev.

[Ad Bot]

[Megaguy2]

could just be me but i think that sev's entire plan was just to spam for posts so this could get loads of pages and everyone would think "jesus that's a huge drama never going there!"

[SeventhSandwich]

Even if I was a bad player, you can't possibly be saying that one bad player banned means the entire system is a success?

Also, about the banlist, it's been done before. Several times, including now.

Link

Riiiiiight, that's why we're full most of the time the server is up, right?

Your server has a player cap of 30 people. It might have an additional 15 people who want to get in but can't. As you ban good players, that buffer zone of 15 people will start to drain out until your average server traffic starts to show decreasing numbers. It'll take awhile, just watch.

i only posted the length, which is dynamically updating btw.

Can we see the whole thing?

[SeventhSandwich]

could just be me but i think that sev's entire plan was just to spam for posts so this could get loads of pages and everyone would think "jesus that's a huge drama never going there!"

What could I possibly gain from that?

[Tomcat]

Actually it wasn't one bad player banned, in which that statement you are admitting that you are a bad player, it was around 511.
How do you know there are a additional fifteen people who want in but can't? Where are you getting this information?

[Lugnut]

could just be me but i think that sev's entire plan was just to spam for posts so this could get loads of pages and everyone would think "jesus that's a huge drama never going there!"

ooh, a great tactic. this drama has been the top of drama for all day...

Can we see the whole thing?

our banlist? I'll have to ask kniaz if he wants to do that, but i'll gladly show our- hold on


yeah.

I view it as his property, so I won't be just posting it here. he can post it here if he'd like.

What could I possibly gain from that?

drawing 'potential players' away from the server 'supporting your claims'?

[Böltster]

Even if I was a bad player, you can't possibly be saying that one bad player banned means the entire system is a success?
Link
Your server has a player cap of 30 people. It might have an additional 15 people who want to get in but can't. As you ban good players, that buffer zone of 15 people will start to drain out until your average server traffic starts to show decreasing numbers. It'll take awhile, just watch.
Can we see the whole thing?

again with the predictions

what you're saying can't be falsified, that's why it's so stupid.

[SeventhSandwich]

Actually it wasn't one bad player banned, in which that statement you are admitting that you are a bad player, it was around 511.
How do you know there are a additional fifteen people who want in but can't? Where are you getting this information?

It's called an estimation. If your server is constantly full there's probably a number of people who are waiting to get in but can't. This isn't some kind of crazy guess.

drawing 'potential players' away from the server 'supporting your claims'?

who the forget cares?

The reason why I try to get stuff changed is because it feels good knowing I made something a little less stuffty. Furthermore, this whole time I've said that the reason your server will empty out is because of your no tolerance policy on the /setname command, so why would i bother trying to accelerate that if it's an imminent result?

again with the predictions

what you're saying can't be falsified, that's why it's so stupid.

I don't even see what you're getting at.

[Electrk]

This topic has severely damaged Seventh's credibility

[Electrk]

Seventh's posts in this topic have severely damaged his credibility

Fixed

[HellsSpot]

27 pages about someone getting permanently banned from a server for not following the rules?
27.
I think this topic has gone extremely off-topic, or I am wrong and didn't look at previous pages. Whatever the reason is, just please stop.

[SeventhSandwich]

This topic has severely damaged Seventh's credibility

Who cares?

My credibility comes from my word, not from some invisible reputation bar calculated based on how many people agree/disagree with what I post in a drama thread.

Plus there's people who agree with me in this thread, so my credibility with them is increased.

I don't see what you're getting at?

[Böltster]

I don't even see what you're getting at.

you're making a prediction that can't be proven wrong. it can't be falsified.

you're claiming that something (that happens in 100% of cases - servers losing popularity) will happen in an unspecified amount of time ("it'll take a while, just wait") - and then claiming it's going to happen all because of their ban policy. that can't be proven wrong. it's exactly the same as an astrological prediction, that's why i called you out for it before.

[Tomcat]

Who cares?

My credibility comes from my word, not from some invisible reputation bar calculated based on how many people agree/disagree with what I post in a drama thread.

Plus there's people who agree with me in this thread, so my credibility with them is increased.

I don't see what you're getting at?

It's getting at you made nothing better because you added to the loving problem.
Also, nobody knows how many people want to get into the server, your argument is invalid.
Give me three people who have agreed with you in the thread and are actively posting.

[SeventhSandwich]

you're making a prediction that can't be proven wrong. it can't be falsified.

you're claiming that something (that happens in 100% of cases - servers losing popularity) will happen in an unspecified amount of time ("it'll take a while, just wait") - and then claiming it's going to happen all because of their ban policy. that can't be proven wrong. it's exactly the same as an astrological prediction, that's why i called you out for it before.

I would give you a specified amount of time if Lugnut would give me the banlist.

It's getting at you made nothing better because you added to the loving problem.
Also, nobody knows how many people want to get into the server, your argument is invalid.
Give me three people who have agreed with you in the thread and are actively posting.

Broze, Kimon, Mister Cheese.

Also, I'm not concerned with the reputation of my posts, I'm concerned with the validity. Whether or not you agree with me doesn't matter because you're a third party who isn't involved with the thread or Lugnut's server. (Unless you're an admin, but my statement still stands considering you at least weren't there when I was banned).