Author Topic: Hammereditor - Idiot who rages  (Read 4396 times)

So you both are in the same house and instead or arguing in person you argue over the forums?

So you both are in the same house and instead or arguing in person you argue over the forums?
That's exactly why I want this topic locked. We already resolved it yesterday but hammer bumped the topic for no reason.

That's exactly why I want this topic locked. We already resolved it yesterday but hammer bumped the topic for no reason.


It was just to say that I am not completely raging and it was resolved yesterday.
The reason I started replying today is that it's not fair when Pacnet exaggerates so much.


It was just to say that I am not completely raging and it was resolved yesterday.
The reason I started replying today is that it's not fair when Pacnet exaggerates so much.
Just let the topic die. Seriously. Is that too hard for you? Make posts in other Drama topics.

I'm not replying anymore because I don't want to be banned.

I'm not replying anymore because I don't want to be banned.
Again? :cookieMonster:


Why'd you have to bump this?

people seriously need to learn what a bump is.

people seriously need to learn what a bump is.
I took a lot of time to make this go on the second page

you guys are such drama queens lol

I took a lot of time to make this go on the second page

you can't make a topic go on the second page unless you can lock it.
the fact people didn't post in it anymore isn't your doing, it's them not posting in it.

you guys are such drama queens lol

Agreed! Hammer should get a life and go to anger class, and Pacnet should get his freedom.

people seriously need to learn what a bump is.

Bump - The act of bumping a post to the top of the section/forum.

That's what I learned...

Bump - The act of bumping a post to the top of the section/forum.

That's what I learned...

no, it's posting in a topic that's already a few pages back.
if that would be it, every post would be a bump.

Unfortunately, that is impossible, We cannot kick each other out no matter what. You think we both own 50% of the hosting service, but you, pacnet, quit for a week once while I did all the hard work. And in the early days you were too lazy to handle everything. Also, in order to earn this tower server, our dad said I and pacnet had to earn awards in some kind of boring contest. I got 2 3rd places and pacnet only got one 4th place. Therefore, I got more awards and own more of the hosting service. I had to surrender to 50% because pacnet taught me all of the technical stuff.
I also believe he's spreading rumors that I got kicked out, although that s impossible becasue we own 50%. For anybody who heard those rumors, they are false.
Then I apologized about it and begged to keep the hosting service together because it is best for our clients and our reputation.
Yesterday pacnet said that we can do 2 things:
1: Split and have seperate hosting services on the tower server
2: I have to sign a contract that if I "rage" again, Pacnet will kick me out.
I accepted option 2 becasue I don't want the hosting service split apart. I need Pacnet's help sometimes, and Pacnet doesn't have enough spare time to care about managing ALL the clients. I manage half and pacnet does the other half. In the beginning, I was so enthusiastic about this hosting service and I wanted to keep the dream. Once Pacnet realized that the service was going to work out, he joined back in.
Everybody, do you want me to tell you how weird pacnet is?? And he is exaggerating everything here.
I actually truly own more because Pacnet quit at one time.

If youre thinking about it, I never rage-quitted a server ever in blockland. And Pacnet is mean sometimes,  and annoying.
Listen, you and pacnet are brothers. You shouldn't fight. How about you two talk it out?