Trust Invite

[Treynolds416]

Did the slick account get banned then?

Edit: oh lord, don't tell me it's because you want to keep the post count in that account at 555

[Ad Bot]

[TripNick]

Slicksilver555, Slicksilver, Rosli, TripleNickels, Triple Nickels, Slicks555, Slick555 and Dr. S are all banned accounts of mine.

Edit: oh lord, don't tell me it's because you want to keep the post count in that account at 555

OH stuff that is the coolest coincidence I've ever loving seen

[jes00]

Slicksilver555, Slicksilver, Rosli, TripleNickels, Triple Nickels, Slicks555, Slick555 and Dr. S are all banned accounts of mine.

Wow, $180 for Badspot.

[Lugnut]

Wow, $180 for Badspot.

/ 8 cuz taxes

[Wheatley]

/ 8 cuz taxes

Holy crap, what country has 77.5% sales tax

[Lugnut]

Holy crap, what country has 77.5% sales tax

probably not actually taxes
but i hear he only gets 8 / 20 bucks per sale

[TripNick]

He's deleted 23 keys that I owned personally, at least 8 of Robo Noob's, 2 of HPRC's, 6 of Beachbum's, and like 2 other peoples' keys. 8 of mine and the others listed were all deleted at once about 2 years ago, and then a few weeks ago he deleted 15 of my keys.

To get your key revoked for bad behavior you have to be literally the worst person in the entire game.

[Lugnut]

$460 spent on this game

holy loving stuff.

[Treynolds416]

It's funny, the more money you give to badspot the less he likes you

[TripNick]

It's fine, I don't like him either. I think he governs his forum system with a biased mind, develops his game in a direction that alienates developers (mainly v10-v18 or so, not talking about v21), and has a massively overblown internet confidence. In a few years I might build a suit against him from all the keys he's revoked from me without proper legal backing. I figure I can get $500 for the keys and maybe another $500 for emotional damage or whatever, my original key (1359) is my pin code to life.

[Lugnut]

i might suggest not tipping your hand at this point and removing that.

no, badspot can't view edits unless he added an entire system in for it.

[TripNick]

I don't think he'll ban me for it. It's not a direct attack against him and it's a seemingly empty threat.

[Lugnut]

I don't think he'll ban me for it. It's not a direct attack against him and it's a seemingly empty threat.

No, he'll use it as defence against you, or simply use it as a sign to contact a lawyer about possibilities, and strengthen his defences against that kind of a lawsuit, making your job harder and have to spend more time with a lawyer, paying more, making the result less valuable to you.

he will use it against you. remove it.

unless, of course, it is simply an

empty threat.

and you're not actually going to do anything about it.

i might be wrong about alternative medicine, but I am not wrong about this.E: you may not even have a defence. did anyone actually read the EULA or other documents pertaining to "i reserve the right to revoke any user's access to my game at any time for any reason"?

sure, that's in the forums. what about the actual keys?E:"lifetime membership"?

[TripNick]

No, he'll use it as defence against you, or simply use it as a sign to contact a lawyer about possibilities, and strengthen his defences against that kind of a lawsuit, making your job harder and have to spend more time with a lawyer, paying more, making the result less valuable to you.

Declaring intention to sue prior to suing does not strengthen the opposite's defense.

he will use it against you. remove it.

unless, of course, it is simply an  and you're not actually going to do anything about it.

I don't know what I'll do, it was just a comment I made. I haven't put any serious thought into it.

E: you may not even have a defence. did anyone actually read the EULA or other documents pertaining to "i reserve the right to revoke any user's access to my game at any time for any reason"?

There is no EULA or ToS for Blockland as a game. Badspot has no legal right to revoke any key for any reason aside from fraudulent purchase. That's like a grocery store coming to your house and taking back their watermelons because they see the way you are using them is unfit.

[Lugnut]

Declaring intention to sue prior to suing does not strengthen the opposite's defense.

no, it gives them the chance to review their defenses and possibly patch issues that may cause them to have problems.

I don't know what I'll do, it was just a comment I made. I haven't put any serious thought into it.

okay.

There is no EULA or ToS for Blockland as a game. Badspot has no legal right to revoke any key for any reason aside from fraudulent purchase. That's like a grocery store coming to your house and taking back their watermelons because they see the way you are using them is unfit.

Facinating. So people like Okiver (lets say he made a legitimate purchase) are known to potentially cause harm to the community by releasing a virus using his forums or game as a medium. he could revoke it then, yes?

revoking it because he hates you is ille-

That's like a grocery store coming to your house and taking back their watermelons because they see the way you are using them is unfit.

okay.I just don't believe in telling the opponent my moves in advance. If you don't actually intend on following said moves (more accurately, 'playing said game' instead of 'moves') then that's your choice