Author Topic: [FLOWCHART] so you think homoloveuality is sinful?  (Read 3208 times)



This doesn't seem biased

This doesn't seem biased
Naw, it's just truthful. When one side of an argument is mind-numbingly stupid the actual, feasible truth starts to seem biased.

Naw, it's just truthful. When one side of an argument is mind-numbingly stupid the actual, feasible truth starts to seem biased.

You realize that that statement right there is completely biased, right?

Just since you don't share a certain opinion, you're Riddler!


This doesn't seem biased

This isn't bias. This is how a debate works. If you want to argue against it with facts as well please do.

I think we are forgetting the process doesn't have anything to do with the church.

This doesn't seem biased
Don't talk about bias until you can argue every point outlined in the chart and or provide a solid argument against homoloveuality.

People against gay rights disgust me. A few of my close friends male and female are gay, homophobic richardheads just make me mad.
It's always the ones with clearly sub par intelligence that are against it, too.

You realize that that statement right there is completely biased, right?
I wasn't aware the truth could be biased. The truth is there is no rational or intelligent reason to deny homoloveuals the right to marry. Any religious grounds one could have to contest it with (implying religious ground is solid to begin with) has been shot down entirely by the chart, and without some hate-mongering religion with which to use, what other argument could a person make?

I think we are forgetting the process doesn't have anything to do with the church.
Tell that to America!

Tell that to America!

Haha yeah. Needs more secular states.

>America

>Secular

When that day comes I'll dress up like Lesley Gore and skip down the street singing songs.

(No really, people trust secular folk less than rapists over here)

It is bias to begin with for the starting opposing quotes all being purposely stupid sounding.
It is bias to make all of those say stupid things like "because jesus said so!" and "the bible defines marriage to be one-man-one-woman" (also the answer to that latter quote doesn't even change anything, marriage is still said to be man and woman, they didn't justify gay marriage in their answer even slightly.
The point is that there is bias.

And no I don't appose gay marriage, or agree with any of these points, just pointing it out.

It is bias to begin with for the starting opposing quotes all being purposely stupid sounding.
It is bias to make all of those say stupid things like "because jesus said so!" and "the bible defines marriage to be one-man-one-woman" (also the answer to that latter quote doesn't even change anything, marriage is still said to be man and woman, they didn't justify gay marriage in their answer even slightly.
The point is that there is bias.

No, bias is defined as "prejudice" and "preconceived judgement". This argument is considered and is pro-gay marriage. It is the anti-gay marriage opinion that is prejudice and preconceived.

A passionate argument for a side is not bias.

I'm all for letting homoloveuals marry, but we shouldn't be giving them any more rights than the average person just since they prefer richard up their butt/vagina on their vagina, at the moment tons of pro-gay companies are pampering them with praise and special products.

I already have to deal with a school where there's one gay person who keeps using the family values card when someone does what he doesn't like, or when he has to do something he doesn't like.