Author Topic: The Aeris-Dezcaben Fiasco  (Read 6993 times)


It sickens me that people would sooner pusillanimous individual out of an argument and insult both sides for arguing before they'd actually take a side.

I have exactly two things to say.

Dezcaban, we are both hypocrites, you the more so. Secondly, you tried to use a formal argument but you don't know the actual literary definition of irony, might want to look that one up.

don't try to tell me what I am / doing unless you have valid evidence lol

-snip-

This guy is a brony, so I immediately mistrust his judgement.

This guy is a brony, so I immediately mistrust his judgement.
Didn't his alt Atlantic use a research-cut avatar?

I wouldn't be surprised if they are the same person. Seems like something handicapped ass Aeris would do for fun.

I wouldn't be surprised if they are the same person. Seems like something handicapped ass Aeris would do for fun.
Aeris = Deceius = Atlantic

and thus starts

the Dezcaberis wars

On the topic of irrelevant stuff:
chick-fil-a: "dezcaban you're a forgeter richard whore monday gtfo my shop"

dezcaban: "i'd like a chicken burger please"

i don't generally take other's opinions to heart, especially if it means i have to give up delicious chicken burgers
They grow up so fast. There were a few other juicy ones but the topic was locked.  

what does that even have to do with anything other than prove i like chicken burgers

see, what i mean by evidence to go with an argument is:

Quote from: example
Areis has a habit of getting banned often, due to random insults while fighting with me. Here is a few examples:






http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=203313.msg5622380#msg5622380


Click the images for a link to their post.

Note a few things:

The argument is relevant to the topic at hand.
There is clear evidence to support my argument, pictures and links at hand.
The pictures are also relevant to the topic at hand.

This guy is a brony, so I immediately mistrust his judgement.

lol woooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooow

The first picture is debatable. The second being bullstuff since that's commonly said and that's the only time I've ever seen a ban for it. The third is no where near as bad as some of the things others have posted before, I'd say selective moderation. Fourth was my choice. Your "evidence" doesn't support your argument due to you not having an argument at all. You don't know how to have one and all you've done is bs it.

 Note a few things:
All of those posts are relevant to the topic at the time they were posted.
You're acting like this isn't your fault as well.
Those pictures are as relevant as my quote.

i didn't think they would actually use this thread for arguing, lol

-snip-
The argument was that you get banned while speaking to me. It was not to dispute the reasons why badspot banned you. Please read, and if needed, reread the argument before trying to respond.

Note a few things:
All of those posts are relevant to the topic at the time they were posted.
Those posts contained bannable material, by judgement of Badspot.

You're acting like this isn't your fault as well.
Please provide evidence along with claims.

Those pictures are as relevant as my quote.
Please take more time to formulate sentences.