Author Topic: Correlation?  (Read 3962 times)

I got a better idea, let me find an Objective article. Nobody seems to do that.

Everyone who objects to pot being good for you isn't a scientist.

I got a better idea, let me find an Objective article. Nobody seems to do that.
or you could prove to me that weed is actually hazardous to your health

That's not true at all, Darkness. There are plenty of "scientists" who object to it. And that's an incredibly vague term. You would want someone who actually studies the affects in a real clinical trial, which that article seemed to have.

just because pot doesn't hurt you, doesn't mean it doesn't turn you into a flamboyant friendron

Objective means unbiased, Subjective means opinionated.

just because pot doesn't hurt you, doesn't mean it doesn't turn you into a flamboyant friendron

again, just the user. that's like saying riding a skateboard turns you into a flamboyant friendron

again, just the user. that's like saying riding a skateboard turns you into a flamboyant friendron
It does. Nonono with skaters that is true. Swear to gawd

just because pot doesn't hurt you, doesn't mean it doesn't turn you into a flamboyant friendron
guys like you and sunny are the reasons alcohol is legal and weed isnt
Objective means unbiased, Subjective means opinionated.
doesn't make it a fact. i find it amazing that people can throw solid evidence at you and you will still have this stupid mindset that everything about weed and the people who smoke it is bad.

i hate alcohol too. Darkness is right, just the users. i just see the majority of the friendrons


guys like you and sunny are the reasons alcohol is legal and weed isntdoesn't make it a fact. i find it amazing that people can throw solid evidence at you and you will still have this stupid mindset that everything about weed and the people who smoke it is bad.

I don't touch the subject of legalization. All I'm saying is that there seems to be a correlation. And I'm not dismissing your arguments, I'm just saying that they're not 100% scientific. It seems like it's impossible to find an unbiased source on marijuana. Again, all I'm saying is that there seems to be a correlation. It's funny that people assume that I hold other opinions and are attacking me for that xD

I don't touch the subject of legalization. All I'm saying is that there seems to be a correlation. And I'm not dismissing your arguments, I'm just saying that they're not 100% scientific. It seems like it's impossible to find an unbiased source on marijuana. Again, all I'm saying is that there seems to be a correlation. It's funny that people assume that I hold other opinions and are attacking me for that xD

what's with the pursuit of unbiased arguments? everyone loving ever is going to be biased. no one will ever not be.

what's with the pursuit of unbiased arguments? everyone loving ever is going to be biased. no one will ever not be.

You can get close, and close is better than not giving a crap. Go look up the scientific method.

You can get close, and close is better than not giving a crap. Go look up the scientific method.

Who are you to say those people were biased? I can assure you they used the scientific method to make it unbiased.

Who are you to say those people were biased? I can assure you they used the scientific method to make it unbiased.

The studies, maybe. But a website dedicated to nerds who smoke isn't the best thing to link. Link the actual studies.