Milk - IT IS BAD FOR YOU

[Dezcaban]

my snake is so hard it's beginning to hurt oooo~

[Ad Bot]

[PowerDag]

I went just now and downed a glass of milk.

Take that, Jeep!

[johnnyboy]

i drink milk like a man
by the gallon

[Jeep]

Did you even read a word of that?
It says nowhere that it will make you gay, only that it will raise estrogen levels.
It does say this, however:

Actually, yes. I did read it. Not sure if you did the same. As I said in my post. High estrogen CAN cause you to start acting feminine, and end up turning gay or bi as a result. It's unlikely, however, estrogen has other adverse effects that are possible on men. Such as cancer.

I went just now and downed a glass of milk.

Take that, Jeep!

Everyone that appears on milk cartons is now by default a homoloveual.

[PowerDag]

Everyone that appears on milk cartons is now by default a homoloveual.

Joke's on you, I buy bags of milk, not cartons.

We have that in Canada!

[Wynd_Fox]

Jeep's a nutter. Nothing can make you gay after birth.

EDIT: Bag milk is best milk.

EDIT 2: And effeminacy and homoloveuality aren't the same thing. I don't think estrogen makes you any girlier, but I know it doesn't turn people gay or bi.

[Headcrab Zombie]

Actually, yes. I did read it. Not sure if you did the same. As I said in my post. High estrogen CAN cause you to start acting feminine, and end up turning gay or bi as a result. It's unlikely, however, estrogen has other adverse effects that are possible on men.

Seriously though, I can't find a single reliable source that supports estrogen after birth causing homoloveuality

[RedGajin]

Jeep's a nutter. Nothing can make you gay after birth.

show a straight woman your face, then come back to me
#baZING

[Wynd_Fox]

Just because I make her lose faith in humanity doesn't make her a lesbian.

#depressed

[Jeep]

Jeep's a nutter. Nothing can make you gay after birth.

Proof?

@Headcrab:

Here you go:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/g4757213w9045228/

[Wynd_Fox]

"The available studies, often deficient in methodology, have produced conflicting and largely negative results as to a hormonal theory of human homoloveuality." I could be wrong, but isn't that saying those studies are hokum? That was in the article you linked, by the way.

[Jeep]

"Animal research has demonstrated the modifiability of love-dimorphic mating behavior by hormone and brain manipulation."

[Wynd_Fox]

Yeah, but the above quote is saying there's a good chance that's not true. Also: "Unfortunately, there is hardly any overlap between psychoendocrine studies on loveual orientation in man and on love-dimorphic mating behavior in subhuman mammals that would allow systematic comparisons."

[Headcrab Zombie]

Proof?

The burden of proof doesn't work like that

Proof?
http://www.springerlink.com/content/g4757213w9045228/

I can't read the full article because it wants me to pay to see it; all I see is the abstract. It says absolutely nothing about the results of the study, just what its about.
I can say that it discusses prenatal effects, which is the exact opposite of the point I was making:

...suggestion of preventing homoloveuality by prenatal hormone manipulation.
... and the issue of prenatal endocrine influences on human loveual orientation.

Seriously though, I can't find a single reliable source that supports estrogen after birth causing homoloveuality