Let's write a letter to Mitt Romney!

[Ben Grapevine]

The environmental movement is a joke

[Ad Bot]

[fred da kiko]

I would vote for Obama because Mitt Romney's "values" kind of suck. I don't mean to sound like a friend here, but I think Ron Paul would be better than Obama or Romney, too bad no one votes for him "because he can't win."

[TripNick]

I would vote for Obama because Mitt Romney's "values" kind of suck. I don't mean to sound like a friend here, but I think Ron Paul would be better than Obama or Romney, too bad no one votes for him "because he can't win."

That doesn't make you sound like a friend, it's true.

[Swat 3]

They both suck.


But Romney is better than Obama.

[Kimon]

I would vote for Obama because Mitt Romney's "values" kind of suck. I don't mean to sound like a friend here, but I think Ron Paul would be better than Obama or Romney, too bad no one votes for him "because he can't win."

Neither parties support Ron Paul, so it's nearly impossible. At least I think so.. correct me if I'm wrong. But he looked like he had good ideas. Didn't pay much attention to him though, because I think we all knew it would come down to Obama and Romney.

[Kimon]

They both suck.


But Romney is better than Obama.

Spot on. Hahaha.

[TripNick]

Neither parties support Ron Paul, so it's nearly impossible. At least I think so.. correct me if I'm wrong. But he looked like he had good ideas. Didn't pay much attention to him though, because I think we all knew it would come down to Obama and Romney.

Ron Paul is a libertarian, so he's endorsed by the libertarian party. It doesn't have a ton of following in America but it's actually increasing since people are sick of the stuff we're getting from republicans and democrats.

[Kimon]

Ron Paul is a libertarian, so he's endorsed by the libertarian party. It doesn't have a ton of following in America but it's actually increasing since people are sick of the stuff we're getting from republicans and democrats.

Oh. Let's hope someone like him gets popular, because his ideas sounded pretty good. But I don't know many ideas of his, can somebody tell me them?

[Tammy]

I would vote for Obama because Mitt Romney's "values" kind of suck. I don't mean to sound like a friend here, but I think Ron Paul would be better than Obama or Romney, too bad no one votes for him "because he can't win."

Ron Paul really couldn't win unless he would have gotten the Republican nomination. The United State's two-party system is forgeted up so much third parties don't have a chance. If he did run as a third party, he gain enough traction to split the Republican voters, but that would just result in Obama in winning.

The actual Libertarian candidate is Gary Johnson, he actully seems like a pretty cool guy and doesn't afraid of anything, but sadly he probably doesn't have a chance.

[Anti-Block]

Nuclear energy is the solution to all our problems, it's extremely efficient and produces way less toxic byproduct per kilojoule than traditional combustion plants, and the toxic byproduct can be cleaned into nontoxic particles for relatively little money. The only problem is people don't want to build nuclear power plants because they're so loving expensive to build because of all the government regulations. Now, I'm not saying we should let people build nuclear power plants with no regulations, so don't get up on me about that.

nuclear waste is not something to take lightly. get back to me once they've invented nuclear fusion and mayble i'll consider it being a valid source of energy instead of a time bomb

As far as your apocalyptic future idea goes, that makes no logical sense. The pollution levels would have to be so high to require a gas mask it's not even worth thinking about. The day won't come for at least a hundred years, at which point we'll have tons of technology developed by companies, not the government, to clean pollution. The government doesn't need their hand in everything.

okay yeah i was being pretty melodramatic

but are you going to completely deny the fact that we're loving up the earth?

By the way, natural gas combusts into water and CO2. Burning it doesn't pollute the environment, at best it increases the greenhouse effect by a super minor amount, and that's a whole different issue that I can rant about.
You're wrong.

i don't care about burning natural gas, i'm talking about fracking

[dorkdotdan]

Ron Paul's face was on Jeopardy yesterday.

[TripNick]

The actual Libertarian candidate is Gary Johnson, he actully seems like a pretty cool guy and doesn't afraid of anything, but sadly he probably doesn't have a chance.

I believe they funded RP too.

nuclear waste is not something to take lightly. get back to me once they've invented nuclear fusion and mayble i'll consider it being a valid source of energy instead of a time bombokay yeah i was being pretty melodramatic

this.

The unit is capable of converting up to 5 tons per day of hazardous wastes and other matter into syngas, net electricity, recyclable metal ingot, without any air emissions or ash from the gasification process.

It was developed for Japan's nuclear waste mess.

but are you going to completely deny the fact that we're loving up the earth? i don't care about burning natural gas, i'm talking about fracking

No, we're damaging the earth, but it's not something that needs our immediate and undivided attention, especially as a country. It's not the government's job to tell power companies how to produce their energy.

[Kearn]

nuclear waste is not something to take lightly.

we store nuclear waste hundreds of meters underground in the middle of nowhere, what are you talking about

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_Isolation_Pilot_Plant

[dorkdotdan]

Nuclear energy produces very little waste.

[Swat 3]

Nuclear energy produces very little waste.

You are wrong.