And I've said before, there isn't a need to drink to the point of being drunk. See this post (that you seemed to have NOT READ you blind hypocrite) I made much earlier about being tipsy:It doesn't have to be worse or better than drinking while driving. It's still an irresponsible act done while driving. They are both impairments to actively focusing on the road that make it more likely to be a part of accidents. You're ignoring the fact that they're similar problems.
Jesus loving christ it's like trying to argue with a child. If you've wanted me to forfeit this argument just by being so absolutely stubborn in your "holier-than-thou" "alcohol = alcoholics" defense, congratulations you win by being ignorant. Enjoy your prize of being a lonely ignorant fool.
You keep ignoring the fact that a similarity isn't the definition of relevance. Driving alone, without the influence of any drug, is no where near as harmful as alcohol. There's a difference between a completely avoidable risk and one which is based on probability. Alcohol is a toxin, driving is not. And, even then, it isn't a luxury. Yes, I understand that people don't always have to be drunk when they drink, but that doesn't dismiss the argument what so ever.
How am I acting like a child? I've been trying to calm the tone of my argument to a reasonable, non-insultive tone. You keep referencing me as lonely, a child, an ignorant fool, etc. I find it funny that you'd reference someone else with childish qualities when you can't express a point without insulting them.
Poll