Poll

Who do you want as president?

Obama
105 (46.3%)
Romney
47 (20.7%)
Johnson
14 (6.2%)
Stein
9 (4%)
Anderson
2 (0.9%)
Other
16 (7%)
None of the above
21 (9.3%)
I'm an anarchist.
13 (5.7%)

Total Members Voted: 227

Author Topic: 2012 Election Megathread  (Read 69743 times)

If they were Democrats you wouldn't have a problem.
Also:
thats not true at all. There's a reason I don't watch msnbc.
You get information from websites. Hm, that about explains it.
i also get news from CNN. I fail to see your point.

thats not true at all. There's a reason I don't watch msnbc.i also get news from CNN. I fail to see your point.
I'm saying you seem to be biased and you said you get your news from websites, which can easily be lies.

thats not true at all. There's a reason I don't watch msnbc.i also get news from CNN. I fail to see your point.
CNN has spin lol

I'm saying you seem to be biased and you said you get your news from websites, which can easily be lies.
and television can't be lies?
CNN has spin lol
as far as I can tell, CNN is one of the least biased news sources this election.

and television can't be lies?as far as I can tell, CNN is one of the least biased news sources this election.
I never said anything about television being truthful, and you said you also get some of your information from television so that could also provide more lies.

I'm saying you seem to be biased and you said you get your news from websites, which can easily be lies.
There ARE in fact sources in the media you can trust believe it or not

and television can't be lies?as far as I can tell, CNN is one of the least biased news sources this election.
For them ost part, it is, but republicans have stufffests when CNN promotes something they disagree with.  If you watch Fox News, you aren't a credible source.

and television can't be lies?as far as I can tell, CNN is one of the least biased news sources this election.
Least biased. Yeah not much else to say.

There ARE in fact sources in the media you can trust believe it or not
I know, but I'm suspicious about his.

For them ost part, it is, but republicans have stufffests when CNN promotes something they disagree with.  If you watch Fox News, you aren't a credible source.
And vice versa. It's a lovely cycle of enemies pointing fingers at their enemies who are pointing fingers at their enemies who are pointing fingers at their enemies-

I know, but I'm suspicious about his.
Where the hell do you get your information?  A magical fairy who floats the forget around documenting everything that occurs?  The media's purpose isn't to simply impose fear and gain ratings, they actually do deliver information on to the public.  A writeup on a website is also much more accurate than a live show/reading.

And vice versa. It's a lovely cycle of enemies pointing fingers at their enemies who are pointing fingers at their enemies who are pointing fingers at their enemies-
Only there's blatant reports stating Fox's biased attributes.  I understand that CNN is more liberal, but, let's take NPR for example.  They're considered to be one of the least biased news sites available, and Fox News watchers simply ignore their existence.  I refer to as many news sources as possible.

Quote

    67% of Fox viewers believed that the "U.S. has found clear evidence in Iraq that Saddam Hussein was working closely with the al Qaeda terrorist organization" (Compared with 56% for CBS, 49% for NBC, 48% for CNN, 45% for ABC, 16% for NPR/PBS).

    The belief that "The U.S. has found Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq" was held by 33% of Fox viewers and only 23% of CBS viewers, 19% for ABC, 20% for NBC, 20% for CNN and 11% for NPR/PBS

    35% of Fox viewers believed that "the majority of people [in the world] favor the U.S. having gone to war" with Iraq. (Compared with 28% for CBS, 27% for ABC, 24% for CNN, 20% for NBC, 5% for NPR/PBS)
« Last Edit: November 05, 2012, 07:46:51 PM by Lalam24 »

Where the hell do you get your information?  A magical fairy who floats the forget around documenting everything that occurs?  The media's purpose isn't to simply impose fear and gain ratings, they actually do deliver information on to the public.  A writeup on a website is also much more accurate than a live show/reading.
Yes, I have a fairy. forgets sake the point I was trying to make is he said he gets information from websites, which can easily be lies.

Yes, I have a fairy. forgets sake the point I was trying to make is he said he gets information from websites, which can easily be lies.
Yeah, and so can any other source of information.

You refer to more than just one site, by the way.  You do your research on specific subjects, you look for the most unbiased material available.  People who don't do this are either in denial or simply don't understand how knowledge can be skewed.

Yes, I have a fairy. forgets sake the point I was trying to make is he said he gets information from websites, which can easily be lies.
and tv can't?

Guys
Guys
Listen to the radio kk?