Unethical Experiments and The Population

[Lando The Climber]

i dont think youve seen pictures of op

Links?

[Ad Bot]

[Cybersix]

I didn't express this toward every prisoner, only the ones convicted of death row or life imprisonment, they're a waste of resources, and whatever they did that got them sentenced to these convictions obviously deserves no more respect than a pile of dirt.

Some prisoners that are on death row or that are sentenced to life are innocent. Are you saying it's right to experiment on them?

[Alyx Vance]

they're the equivalent of the slang definition of "animals" when they behave this way.
a random murder does not lead to those same advancements. a hitman does not lead to those same advancements. i'm sure anyone who's sentenced to life in prison or death row has done something terrible, terrible enough to suffer the same fate.

Still human.
I'm sure you wouldn't like it if someone started shoving stuff in you and tested stuff on you now would you?

[RedGajin]

they're the equivalent of the slang definition of "animals" when they behave this way.

you're the equivalent of an animal
i mean honestly listen to yourself, you want to murder thousands of people, go take a trip to the mental hospital you creep

[SeventhSandwich]

a random murder does not lead to those same advancements. a hitman does not lead to those same advancements. i'm sure anyone who's sentenced to life in prison or death row has done something terrible, terrible enough to suffer the same fate.

Neither does a bank teller, or a construction worker. Tell me again why we don't just use bank tellers and construction workers as human guinea pigs because there are plenty more bank tellers and construction workers to replace them than murderers and hitmen.

Furthermore, elaborate on how people who do things wrong deserve to be human guinea pigs. Why is that?

[Ceist]

Some prisoners that are on death row or that are sentenced to life are innocent. Are you saying it's right to experiment on them?

if they're innocent and on death row, they're going to die one way or another. even then, this should be done only with hard evidence. if you have 12 eyewitnesses saying yes that man stabbed and raped 5 women, then that's hard evidence. evidence of some man but faulty or having an opposition for opposite evidence disproving the current evidence, the man does not deserve to be experimented upon.

Still human.
I'm sure you wouldn't like it if someone started shoving stuff in you and tested stuff on you now would you?

you're right, i wouldn't, but i didn't do anything wrong to deserve it.

you're the equivalent of an animal
i mean honestly listen to yourself, you want to murder thousands of people, go take a trip to the mental hospital you creep

i am quite clear on this subject, it seems you're just amazed someone has an opinion that completely overviews what you think. yes, murder thousands of guilty, insane, crazed people, hell some of them won't even know what's happening.

Neither does a bank teller, or a construction worker. Tell me again why we don't just use bank tellers and construction workers as human guinea pigs because there are plenty more bank tellers and construction workers to replace them than murderers and hitmen.

Furthermore, elaborate on how people who do things wrong deserve to be human guinea pigs. Why is that?

a bank teller doesn't get  convicted and sentenced to life in prison or death row for no reason, now does he. also  i've elaborated quite enough, if that's not enough then you just have a narrow-minded view point upon the subject.

[Anti-Block]

stop arguing

clones

that is all

[Ceist]

stop arguing

clones

that is all

i agree.

[SeventhSandwich]

a bank teller doesn't get  convicted and sentenced to life in prison or death row for no reason, now does he. also  i've elaborated quite enough, if that's not enough then you just have a narrow-minded view point upon the subject.

Quite the opposite actually. All you do is say that the person deserves it, but you won't say why.

What's really happening here is that you don't know why, but you just 'know' that it's true.

I think you need to reassess your whole philosophy on justice.

[RedGajin]

yes, murder thousands of guilty, insane, crazed people, hell some of them won't even know what's happening.

hey guys lets just all rape small children, its ok because they wont know whats happening :))))

[Alyx Vance]

if they're innocent and on death row, they're going to die one way or another. even then, this should be done only with hard evidence. if you have 12 eyewitnesses saying yes that man stabbed and raped 5 women, then that's hard evidence. evidence of some man but faulty or having an opposition for opposite evidence disproving the current evidence, the man does not deserve to be experimented upon.
you're right, i wouldn't, but i didn't do anything wrong to deserve it.
i am quite clear on this subject, it seems you're just amazed someone has an opinion that completely overviews what you think. yes, murder thousands of guilty, insane, crazed people, hell some of them won't even know what's happening.
a bank teller doesn't get  convicted and sentenced to life in prison or death row for no reason, now does he. also  i've elaborated quite enough, if that's not enough then you just have a narrow-minded view point upon the subject.

You do know that some death-row inmates and life sentence people were actually innocent but framed?
So yea keep in mind that you might also be killing innocents.

[Ceist]

hey guys lets just all rape small children, its ok because they wont know whats happening :))))

this makes no sense nor is it relevant.

Quite the opposite actually. All you do is say that the person deserves it, but you won't say why.

What's really happening here is that you don't know why, but you just 'know' that it's true.

I think you need to reassess your whole philosophy on justice.

he/she needs to be experimented upon because he/she has done something really horrible, stupid, and crazy? i made myself clear you just don't get it or are ignoring my posts.

[Ceist]

You do know that some death-row inmates and life sentence people were actually innocent but framed?
So yea keep in mind that you might also be killing innocents.

yeah i keep them in mind, refer back to one of my previous posts and read it actually.

[SeventhSandwich]

he/she needs to be experimented upon because he/she has done something really horrible, stupid, and crazy? i made myself clear you just don't get it or are ignoring my posts.

Why does she need to be?

What is the determining factor here?

What sets a person who murders someone apart from everyone else in terms of usefulness to research?

[Alyx Vance]

Ceist, you don't get it.
Regardless what they do they still have a loving family (most of the time anyways) and I'm sure they won't appreciate having that person tested on. Remember that it also hurts the people outside of the prison as well as the man/woman being tested upon.
Think about others.