Poll

JVS or BLB?

JVS Content
49 (36.3%)
Rotondo's .blb
86 (63.7%)

Total Members Voted: 135

Author Topic: DOORS: JVS or Rotondo's .blbs?  (Read 4669 times)

I want Conservative to remake the JVS doors into BLB doors, with proper collisions and all that.

Your Pro of Rotondo's doors are also a con.


They may be x6 height, and it may look more realistic...but!


If you have old saves that have JVS and you want to upgrade to ROT's Doors you need to nearly rebuild the whole door frame just to put in the new door, or some builds need to be completely rebuilt just to add one or two new doors.

I don't understand how people have so many technical problems with JVS.
I haven't seen any of these issues.
^ this

I don't understand people's liking the 6bx .blb height over the 5bx JVS.  Maybe it's because in real life, doors are more 5bx compared to my size.  I also don't get how so many people have had bugs with JVS.  Yes, there is that occasional bug where the door doesn't unrender, but a simple restarting/rejoining of the server fixes this.

I don't understand people's liking the 6bx .blb height over the 5bx JVS.
My hat goes through the door frame with JVS. A more realistic door height is actually not that bad.
But there's the thing that nobody talks about for some reason; in real life, different doors have different heights. A door for a mansion would probably be pretty big no matter what time period your build is supposed to be from, but if you're building a regular house from e.g. 1600s Europe, then doors should sometimes only be five bricks tall or even less. But then, of course, the problem of having to sneak through doors arises.

The 6x height is actually more accurate to a real door's width to height ratio. But 5x is more accurate to the blockhead's proportions when compared to a real person.
Actually I'd say my bedroom door would be closer to 7x height if its width is 4x, but that would just look ridiculous really.

A Blockhead is five bricks tall, so to make the doors five bricks tall as well doesn't seem very sensical no matter how you look at it.