cry some more, (some random womans rights historical figure)
see? i cant even think of any lol
A five second google search. Besides, this isn't about women's rights. It is about rape victims.
its quite ironic that you think the man shouldnt be allowed to make his own statement, while the woman can.
respect isnt even the issue. he picked the very perfect moment to picket his opinion, a very relevant one actually. you think hes got no political agenda for himself?
You are right. Every loveual offense has at least two sides. Many "victims" have the probability of lying, providing false witness, or using a guilt trip to win the case. But, I don't think this guy was doing this for the accused "loveual offenders".
I think he did it to keep those who are down or trying to get back up at rock bottom. Or he misunderstood a movement for recovering people as a over the top femnational socialist movement and sought to put women in "their place".
should all opinions have their own condescending private day to protest against one another?
Are you asking if opinions should have their own times to protest? Cause they do already. I don't get the use of the word "condescending".
i actually found it quite funny how he has shown the world that this womans empowerment movement is really all about woman wanting to solve their personal problems with violence.
the picture alone shows how contradictory these woman are.
Once again, not a woman's empowerment movement. I am pretty damn sure that guy got off unharmed. This should be surprising since he pissed off a huge crowd of people already somewhat pissed. Mobs are not that friendly and restrained. The
picture is of them spraying horns, yelling, and crowding around him. This is not violence... if anything it is yelling. Besides victims of violence don't enjoy themselves. He is not only having a grand ol' time but seems to be under the influence also.
summed up:
snozola wants woman to continue to play the victim. very contradictory to a "womans empowerment movement"
I specifically said women or male can be the victim first of all. And one final time, not woman's empowerment movement.
Don't sum up my opinion unless you know what you are talking about.
For those of you still doubting whether what he did was wrong (and I do wonder if there’s something wrong with you, if you have doubts), let me give you an brown townogous situation. Imagine a gathering of black civil rights activists. Imagine Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, and all their colleagues gathered together to demonstrate that being black did not make them lesser people. That being black and living in the South did not mean they were “asking” to be the target of hate crimes.
And at this gathering, a white man decides he should teach them a lesson by pointedly hanging a noose from the nearest tree and laughing at their anger. And other white men, laughing along with him, commend him for taking these activists down a peg.
This is from the post. Since it is obvy none of you read it.... I think he puts it pretty well.
