pageloss response to sev:
I wasn't calling Obama a socialist. In fact, he is not a socialist. He is just utterly horrid at spending money and being a president in general.
I was calling our government a bunch of egotistical socialist pissants.
Wasn't it our government who thought of taxing the rich more and taxing the poor less?
This is taxation based on income. i.e. one of the primary ideals behind socialism.
I didn't know what you were trying to say, but calling Obama supporters 'socialist pigs' means you're calling Obama a socialist. If that's not what you meant, you need to learn English before you post here.
"I was calling our government". So like the entire government? Even the republican congressmen? I don't understand what you're trying to say, but the U.S. is not a socialist nation.
Wasn't it our government who thought of taxing the rich more and taxing the poor less?
This is taxation based on income. i.e. one of the primary ideals behind socialism.
Aren't all forms of taxation somewhat based on income? If you think Obamacare is trying to create a classless society, then you're leaning more to calling him a communist than a socialist.
By that logic, any republican president who doesn't attempt to abolish progressive taxes is also a socialist. Would you agree with that?
