Half Life 2 won VGA's Game of the Decade

[fred da kiko]

Neat. Certainly deserved.

Popularity =/= quality. Half Life 2 is amazingly designed with a great story. The whole series is iconic.

CoD's legacy is just fat teenagers shouting at each other online and eating cornchips in the dark.

forget you, cornchips are delicious.

[Ad Bot]

[BlazingDragon]

I hope you realize that he was joking.

I hope you realize I honestly do not care.

[BlazingDragon]

I suddenly feel bad for never playing this game.

Same here. Never played HL2, played about 2 minutes of the first one though.

[Elecro]

I hope you realize I honestly do not care.

You say you don't care because you know you screwed up.

[BlazingDragon]

You say you don't care because you know you screwed up.

No, I say I don't care because I honestly do not care.

[TheKhoz]

I actually do think that CoD is a great game series. Because they ARE one of the best, they have managed to market themselves to everyone. Even though they get a bad rep, they are still fun.

Plus, the makers get lots of money for very little actual work. This is a douche move, but it's very, very smart.

[RedGajin]

Neat. Certainly deserved.

Popularity =/= quality. Half Life 2 is amazingly designed with a great story. The whole series is iconic.

CoD's legacy is just fat teenagers shouting at each other online and eating cornchips in the dark.

lol its obv popular for a reason, people dont just buy 20 copies and sit on them. im not saying hl2 was bad, but honestly lol seems like a pretty biased rating to me.

[dorkdotdan]

No, I say I don't care because I honestly do not care.

or do you?
*plot twist*

[Qwepir]

but half life 2 was in 2004
its a new decade, it shouldnt have been eligible

[lcyGamma]

lol its obv popular for a reason, people dont just buy 20 copies and sit on them. im not saying hl2 was bad, but honestly lol seems like a pretty biased rating to me.

I disagree. A game doesn't have to be the best to sell a lot. Marketing, exposure, social media-- lots of factors. And how is it biased just because you disagree with it lol?

Here is a topical brown townogy.

Justin Bieber is popular too. Very popular. Doesn't mean he should be at the Grammys.

but half life 2 was in 2004
its a new decade, it shouldnt have been eligible

Not of this decade derp.

[BlazingDragon]

or do you?
*plot twist*

No, I'm pretty sure I don't.

[dorkdotdan]

lol its obv popular for a reason, people dont just buy 20 copies and sit on them. im not saying hl2 was bad, but honestly lol seems like a pretty biased rating to me.

problem is, only one game can win, not a series. How many CoDs have been released this decade?

[SpreadsPlague]

but half life 2 was in 2004
its a new decade, it shouldnt have been eligible

well if you're getting technical, no game should have been eligible (for another 8 years), since there have only been 2 years this decade..

* I didn't actually watch the VGAs so I don't know if it was even for this decade

[RedGajin]

I disagree. A game doesn't have to be the best to sell a lot. Marketing, exposure, social media-- lots of factors. And how is it biased just because you disagree with it lol?

Here is a topical brown townogy.

Justin Bieber is popular too. Very popular. Doesn't mean he should be at the Grammys.

well obv its all a matter of opinion, but honestly why would you choose a game that has probably made like 10x less then like half of the other games out there as a game of the decade? 2000-2010 was full of great, new game releases. hl2 hardly seems like the logical choice lol.

problem is, only one game can win, not a series. How many CoDs have been released this decade?

pretty sure its last decade (could be wrong)
so like 4-5

[RagnaTheBroedge]

well earned and well awarded

I hope you realize I honestly do not care.

ahahaha you're handicapped