Ephilates: Seriously bro?

Author Topic: Ephilates: Seriously bro?  (Read 21749 times)

Only Ephi and I really know what I said that originally that got deleted.  Everyone that is talking about him "administrating" and "stopping the flaming" is wrong because I had said no such likes.

Considering 3 topics were unnecessarily locked, 3 flowing topics is a pretty good compromise.
shut up, you're not making it any better.
so i still wonder:

why do you think making more dramas is going to help
it was discoordination on the poster's part, i agree, someone should lock the other two topics, and ONLY the other two topics.

he's administrating a topic by deleting criticism of himself? damn, now i know what administration is.

It's not criticism, the post indyjones made was purely in spite.

That topic is not the proper place for criticism of his character. If you wanted to criticize his character, make a separate topic.
I'm pretty sure that was tried in the 5 topics preceding the 3 active ones right now...

The drama's will stop when Ephialtes explains himself in detail.

he did
several times, in fact

indyjones posted a blatantly flaming post, ephi deleted it and indy decided to try to post a rebuttal to this. ephi deleted his rebuttals to get the point across to him that the post was wrong and it should have been deleted, then people start getting angry for some reason.
it's not a big deal. you are making it a big deal, not him.
No he didn't. He didn't explain why he locked all those topics. And he is making it a bigger deal the longer he waits to explain himself.

he's administrating a topic.
administrating a topic.
a topic.
His topic (meaning the topic he is interested in).



It's not criticism, the post indyjones made was purely in spite.
i'm talking about the other topics posted.

In that case..

                              ~TOOT~ ~TOOT~ NEXT STOP: DUMBASS VALLEY

                                     (@@@)     (@@@@@)
                               (@@)     (@@@@@@@)        (@@@@@@@)
                         (@@@@@@@)   (@@@@@)       (@@@@@@@@@@@)
                    (@@@)     (@@@@@@@)   (@@@@@@)             (@@@)
               (@@@@@@)    (@@@@@@)                (@)
           (@@@)  (@@@@)           (@@)
        (@@)              (@@@)
       .-.              
       ] [    .-.      _    .-----.
     ."   """"   """""" """"| .--`
    (:--:--:--:--:--:--:--:-| [___    .------------------------.
     |C&O  :  :  :  :  :  : [_9_] |'='|.----------------------.|
    /|.___________________________|___|'--.___.--.___.--.___.-'|
   / ||_.--.______.--.______.--._ |---\'--\-.-/==\-.-/==\-.-/-'/--
  /__;^=(==)======(==)======(==)=^~^^^ ^^^^(-)^^^^(-)^^^^(-)^^^ jgs
~~~^~~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~Yeah, except he hasn't looked any more since you started saying in your last thread.
Brb copying that awesome train

It's not criticism, the post indyjones made was purely in spite.
It was laughing at lub being hypocritical.

he doesn't have anything to explain

only you guys are in the wrong here for spamming the forums lol

The drama's will stop when Ephialtes explains himself in detail.
Or until you guys get banned

he's administrating a topic by deleting criticism of himself? damn, now i know what administration is.
He deleted stuffposts. I've been over this - if he was deleting criticism, indyjones would be the last author of posts to start targeting.

Can you not read either topic where I told you what I said that was deleted?
i read both and it seems a lot like flaming to me

seems a bit hypocritical of the mods, no?
no it doesn't

What? did you even read what i said?
yes i did. people are making a big deal out of it by creating more and more dramas to replace the locked ones, whereas if it wasn't a big deal that wouldn't happen

No he didn't. He didn't explain why he locked all those topics. And he is making it a bigger deal the longer he waits to explain himself.

see above

also god damn you people post fast

Or until you guys get banned
The only people I can see being banned are the op's that "spammed" topics and even then that's stretching it.

he doesn't have anything to explain

only you guys are in the wrong here for spamming the forums lol
we didn't spam, like i said, there was no coordination and we each made a topic without knowledge that the other was making a topic, it was wholly unnecessary to have more than 1 topic.

The drama's will stop when Ephialtes explains himself in detail.

He doesn't have anything to explain. The topic is called "RTB Dedicated Hosting Service - add-on management functionality!" not "RTB Dedicated Hosting Service - post stuffflame about Ephialtes!"

That is NOT the correct place for attacking Ephi.