Opinion about gun control?

[DrMaxwell]

He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.

[Ad Bot]

[TheChaosCarrier]

Remember that time we banned alcohol? Yeah that worked out well didn't it.

Yep.
Exactly my point.
A lot of people simply ignored the Prohibition and brewed their own stuffty alcohol and got wasted.

I don't need to. The only facts I need are that guns kill over 10,000 a year in the U.S. and the 2nd most used weapon in murders, sharp objects, only kill about 1900 people.

You know why?
Gun laws.

[Bisjac]

This 'nut' wouldn't have a gun if there were more strict gun laws.

yes he would have. that "nut" wasnt even of age to buy a gun, so he stole it.
and he intended to murder with it.
hes a criminal.


criminals dont care about what the law says he cannot do. making more gun laws wont affect him.
but it would have affected the teacher who owned the gun and saved everyone.

irony huh

[Tango²]

You know why?
Gun laws.

Exactly, read my quote and you'll understand. Something he failed to do.

[TeslaCoil]

This 'nut' wouldn't have a gun if there were more strict gun laws.

[DrMaxwell]

yes he would have. that "nut" wasnt even of age to buy a gun, so he stole it.
and he intended to murder with it.
hes a criminal.


criminals dont care about what the law says he cannot do. making more gun laws wont affect him.

What Blok was trying to say is if citizens didn't have guns, how would he steal one?

[TheChaosCarrier]

What Blok was trying to say is if citizens didn't have guns, how would he steal one?

Oh my god

You have no idea what you're even considering here.
It's like you know nothing of criminals.

It is so much easier than it looks to obtain a weapon ILLEGALLY.
Hence the name "criminal".
There are criminals that go out of the country just to get a weapon and shoot up "Gun Free Zones."
I bet you the shooter at the Connecticut elementary school obtained his weapon by very illegal methods.

Do I have to draw a loving picture?

[Bisjac]

What Blok was trying to say is if citizens didn't have guns, how would he steal one?

you are about 200 years to late for that idea.
making more gun laws will just limit new guns.
there are millions available guns already in the country. and a thief especially would be able to find one.

what you are suggesting is taking current guns away from legal owners.
that is more unconstitutional then a few measly murders.

[-Blok-]

And meanwhile, in the bank, while the Police is still on it's way, every unarmed patron is dead and the armed robber walks away a free man.
lol k.

Only if this guy robbed the bank.

Also, we are talking about the SWAT, not the police. Why would they deploy the SWAT if they aren't necessary?

[Bisjac]

swat always show up long after the police lol
and the police are always there way to late to prevent violence anyway

[beachbum111111]

Lets solve gun massacres by creating even MORE guns :D

[Tango²]

[DrenDran]

Dear god that's funny.

[TheChaosCarrier]

[IMG]http://i47.tinypic.com/acsyyu.jpg[ /img]
Only if this guy robbed the bank.

Also, we are talking about the SWAT, not the police. Why would they deploy the SWAT if they aren't necessary?

What.
I never said they would deploy swat if they weren't necessary.
My god, stop failing english and loving read.

I said, the armed robber could easily kill everyone in the bank before the initial police force even got there, and they make the call to deploy SWAT teams. A SWAT team would then be unnecessary since everyone is already dead and the robber is long gone.

[Narkro555]

I support this. They shouldn't increase gun control but make it so you have to pass a certain amount of tests to get a gun in the first place.

Most evil criminals are innocent, sane civilians when they get their gun. They only become target of convict laws after they shoot up a public place.

That's almost funny...

But yeah, this is what happens when hillbillies get into their heads that owning killing machines is a freedom more valuable then the life of others.