Author Topic: Opinion about gun control?  (Read 20821 times)

But who do you need to protect against?
Robbers, people trying to kill you, and rabid animals.

forget gun control and the police #THUGLIFE1

Robbers, people trying to kill you, and rabid animals.

Is it really neccessary to have a gun :c

Is it really neccessary to have a gun :c
I mean you could stab those things, if you wanted to try at least.

I mean you could stab those things, if you wanted to try at least.
If no one had a gun, you wouldn't need to protect against someone with a gun, right?

If no one had a gun, you wouldn't need to protect against someone with a gun, right?
Getting to "no one has a gun" is impossible.


He means in a short amount of time, dumbo, not over a couple of years.
He killed them in a rather short amount of time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing

Here's one where hijackers on a plane used box cutters.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks

Guns don't kill people
people kill people
So lets ban people :D

Guns don't kill people
people kill people
So lets ban people :D
"Guns don't kill people, the government does" - Dale

Riddler shot himself because he was bullied by Russian meanies therefore guns = bad

on topic though, you have to make a conscious decision to go out and straight up murder someone, if you're being an idiot and kill yourself then that's unnatural selection at work, chlorinating the gene pool.

Guys, it literally does not matter if it's "necessary or not" to have a gun.

The second amendment to the United States constitution guarantees the right to have a gun. The second amendment is something Americans hold sacred as the gifts of freedom bestowed upon us by our founding fathers. I will never purchase a gun in my life. I would also no sooner give up my right to bear arms than I would give up my right to free speech. It's a constitutional right Americans have, it cannot be taken away. Regulating is fine, but making guns illegal is a direct violation of the rights provided to us by the constitution. Anyone arguing for the abolition of guns is literally in the fullest sense unamerican.

On the note of regulation, any more than currently effective is utterly useless. Since the Gritty Grapnel shooting, many new gun control laws have been proposed. Ninety-nine percent of them would not have changed what happened last Friday. This kid literally killed his mother and took her guns. To kill someone and take their guns requires no background checks, no waiting periods, nothing. Even if his mother had not possessed these weapons, this man was sufficiently inebriated by mental illness to take others' guns. Even if guns were entirely outlawed-- despite the second amendment-- guns will always be in circulation. Millions of guns are registers by people in the USA. This allows police to narrow search results to people who possess a specific model of gun, and is such a useful tool in the game of forensic science. If all guns in the USA were illegally owned, none of them would be registered.

These types of tragedies can not be prevented. I'm sorry to say it-- but they can't. It's not something that people like to hear in a time like this, but outside of assembling a militia at every school to prevent an incident that happens maybe once every 2 years at a single school, nothing will stop crazy people from doing their thing, and every attempt to causes many more problems than it solves.

[/rant]

yes

was a few minutes away from posting this, yes

as an addendum if you have armed guards at every school people will just go shoot up a mall or store or park or stadium or anything with people in it

Gun control? Pfffft we should give our children M60s at the age of 12 and let them run around with them, shooting anything and everything.

I'm the most responsible parent here, aren't I?
The M60 is a heavy gun for a kid anyway and most likely the would drop it and the thing would fall apart. Beside you are doing it wrong! GIVE THEM A TANK WITH TRAINING WHEELS!

Also could someone who lives in the UK explain why you guys have a group of police trained with firearms and body armor even though firearms owner is illegal? Before the laws were made you guys just had traditional police with a baton.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2012, 09:17:17 PM by Harm94 »

The second amendment to the United States constitution guarantees the right to have a gun. The second amendment is something Americans hold sacred as the gifts of freedom bestowed upon us by our founding fathers. I will never purchase a gun in my life. I would also no sooner give up my right to bear arms than I would give up my right to free speech. It's a constitutional right Americans have, it cannot be taken away. Regulating is fine, but making guns illegal is a direct violation of the rights provided to us by the constitution. Anyone arguing for the abolition of guns is literally in the fullest sense unamerican.
The second amendment entails the people's right to have a well-regulated militia and that right's inability to be infringed. It does not refer to any right of citizens to individually posess a gun. It's not a constitutional right to bear a gun, but it is a right to maintain a militia, specifically a well-regulated one.

Banning guns is taking away our 2nd amendment right, and if the government takes that away. Then the people are going to get pretty loving mad.
No, it is not. Read the 2nd amendment. Then think about when that was written.

Quote from: The 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

That was written in 1790, when the most powerful handheld weapon took 1 minute to reload. The reason for people to keep and bear arms was for the Militia.

The Second Amendment should have been abolished when America first had a real military.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm not arguing for gun control, but I'm just saying that the 2nd amendment as it is now is loving stupid.

According to Dictionary.com Arms are: Implements of war, munition, weaponry, weapon system, blazon.

This means that I could have a 20 foot tall nuclear missile in my backyard, which is the "right to keep arms" that is guaranteed to me by the 2nd amendment.

Pageloss and relevent