Poll

x86 Or ARM?

x86
ARM

Author Topic: [MEGATHREAD] Personal Computer - Updated builds thanks to Logical Increments  (Read 1647044 times)

alright I got all of the feedback i needed, thanks

Apperently mineral oil cooled PC's exists.
Unfortunely they don't sell these 'DIY kits' anymore
But apperently you can just buy an aquarium and put a piece of matel in it that support your MB or something.

What neato things can i plug into a pci16 lane that im not using, besides a hd.
I got a mini itx and just using the onboard video. No spots for an expansion out the back, i would mod that thing off

What neato things can i plug into a pci16 lane that im not using, besides a hd.
I got a mini itx and just using the onboard video. No spots for an expansion out the back, i would mod that thing off
Over expensive PCI SSD's!
Or fan controllers
Maybe a sound card
Or just put another cheap-ish GPU in it and dedicate it for multi-monitor stuff.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2015, 02:24:53 PM by espio100 »

A Seagate or Hitachi HDD?
The seagate is 45$ for 1TB but the hitachi is 70$ for 2TB (cheapest I could fine that met my requirements)
Apperently Hitachi lasts longer than seagates and its 2TB (I don't really need that) but I could "split" the drive in 2 virtual drives of 1TB and install windows on one and another OS on the other.

Western Digital or go home.


Western Digital or go home.
also that graph looks terribly skewed because it seems like hitachi and western digital have a huge difference until you actually look on the numbers on the side
« Last Edit: December 21, 2015, 07:03:48 AM by Daswiruch »

HGST drives are the best for reliability/price at the moment IIRC

I don't think it takes in to consideration how many of these drives exist. If there's much less Hitachi drives then there will be less to fail.

Im going to get the western digital one. Same specs as the Seagate only 5 bucks more.
Indeed if you look at the numbers on the left its like "durr only 14%" but I like my stuff to function as long as possible


Nice.

(Merely playing some CSGO)

whats better for a gaming pc, an Intel Core i5-4690 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor or an Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor?

the things I would wanna do:

soft shaders for bl
play ark: survival evolved (on above-minimum settings)
play The Isle (on above-minimum settings)

whats better for a gaming pc, an Intel Core i5-4690 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor or an Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor?

the things I would wanna do:

soft shaders for bl
play ark: survival evolved (on above-minimum settings)
play The Isle (on above-minimum settings)
Well you don't really need multi-threading for gaming but has a bigger bus speed wich is very usefull.
But the i5 has a bus speed of 5GT/s wich is probably fast enough.
Want multi-threading? Get the i7
Want to save money? Get the i5
Oh and by the way I happen to buy the same i5 :^)

But CPU's barely impact the FPS on games as long as you're not bottlenecking your GPU.
But seriously even my laptop with a dual core  2Ghz can run ARK on minimum. For it to run on higher settings you want a good GPU.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2015, 01:14:08 PM by espio100 »

whats better for a gaming pc, an Intel Core i5-4690 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor or an Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor?

the things I would wanna do:

soft shaders for bl
play ark: survival evolved (on above-minimum settings)
play The Isle (on above-minimum settings)

Quadcore i5s for gaming, Hyperthreaded i7s for content creation. No exceptions and no questions