There was 1, which was locked. Another one came, locked again. A third one came, locked again.
I created a topic after those 3 locks, which was deleted. I created it again, and it was deleted again. 3 more topics were created at about the same time. You're right, 1 was enough, that's why they had to keep being posted.
Unfortunately, you don't do any research nor have any clue about what actually happened. Being ignorant may not be your fault because you weren't there, but you don't do any extra research because it works against your held opinions.
Unfortunately, not only was I there, I was talking to Ephialtes the entire time. You're warping the truth, the first one was created, which Ephialtes locked, then about three popped up at the exact same time so Ephialtes locked two of them, then someone made a new one, which he also locked. In case you can't do math, that leaves one open. Maybe he was overstepping his bounds to have locked the first drama topic about himself, but that definitely wouldn't qualify as losing his stuff.
No, he did the crashing and removed the only evidence.
How do you suppose Ephialtes crashed servers? Here's your opportunity to tell the world, he's not going to delete your stuffposts here. You know why? Because this is the right spot for them, not the RTB topic.
Rage-deleting posts offensive to you can be defined as "losing your stuff".
When did he even imply anger? Regardless of their offensive nature, they were off-topic to the RTB topic and were going to start a flame war. Ephialtes is actually being a responsible admin by removing them, he's moderating user interaction to prevent flame wars.
Talking about failures of the service is on-topic. It's more than just those ever-so-slightly out-of-line posts, see my sentence above about your ignorance and incapability to do research. I posted about issues, the posts were deleted. It's oddly totally OK for Ephialtes himself to post about my service's issues in my thread. See the issue here?
Do you know what an Ad Hominem argument is? You're using this logical fallacy everywhere. In an academic setting, your argument would actually be thrown out as invalid for doing this. Anyway; talking about the failures of the service
is on topic. stuffposting about them, however, is not. To an autistic person like you, they may seem like the same thing. I can't blame you for not understanding, I sympathize with your disorder. However, for the rest of us, we understand a hidden message inside other messages. Some stuffposts are messages that contain flaming as a hidden message, and since most of us can understand this, people are quick to polarize and argue. Removing these stuffposts but leaving criticism is a method of allowing proper feedback, yet removing the argument factor.
He did that with the topics I mentioned above. By your definition, he was 75% "losing his stuff".
No, he did not.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm still waiting for a real scenario where Ephialtes actually lost his stuff. I'm not seeing anger as a motive for any of these acts.
Poll