Poll

What is your sexual orientation?

Heteroloveual
Homoloveual
Biloveual
Aloveual

Author Topic: Gay or Nay?  (Read 12818 times)

And homoloveuality is? Where do you draw the line? How do we know which ones are natural?
no i am not implying homoloveuality isn't natural. i'm saying that with all loveuality it's hard to prove it's legitimacy.
EDIT:
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/4189/is-aloveuality-real
ok that part about some gerbils not wanting to forget makes my "hetero/homo occurs in nature" argument invalid

maybe it is natural.  i'm not going to make a judgement until more evidence is brought forth

I don't get why you wouldn't just assume everyone is honest about this kind of thing. It doesn't really affect you if they're aloveual, and I don't see why someone would lie about it.

EDIT: I'm not really talking to Rave, as she seems to admit that it exists.

I'm not sure I really understand what you're saying. I'm not saying I'm right, I'm asking for evidence to support her idea.
Your idea is not credible, it has no sound scientific backing or a general consensus. So before you can try to flag it down for being incorrect, you should say why you are correct.

ok that part about some gerbils not wanting to forget makes my "hetero/homo occurs in nature" argument invalid

maybe it is natural.  i'm not going to make a judgement until more evidence is brought forth
Your argument is stupid in the first place because 'Natural' has no set definition.

Your argument is stupid in the first place because 'Natural' has no set definition.
natural

as in occurring in nature

what are you not getting here

Your idea is not credible, it has no sound scientific backing or a general consensus. So before you can try to flag it down for being incorrect, you should say why you are correct.
Did you completely ignore my explanation? I'm not putting forth a claim, right now, I'm asking her to defend hers.

natural

as in occurring in nature

what are you not getting here
You should probably define nature.

natural

as in occurring in nature

what are you not getting here
So if there are aloveual people living in the city, but not in the forest, aloveuality isn't natural?

Define nature.

So if there are aloveual people living in the city, but not in the forest, aloveuality isn't natural?

Define nature.
Human nature, as in it occurs naturally in people.  It also can't be a deformity or mutation.

Did you completely ignore my explanation? I'm not putting forth a claim, right now, I'm asking her to defend hers.
Misunderstood you

Sorry for the hostility, I was probably unclear. :(

To further support homoloveuality/aloveuality being unnatural, (I have nothing against either) you should pretty much see that humans are built with instincts to survive, part of that being to reproduce. You can't exactly keep your species going if you're not getting a female pregnant/getting pregnant from a male.

Again, I have nothing against either homoloveuals, aloveuals, or anyone else for that matter. I am just stating something that I think makes some sense.

The explanation may seem pretty simple, I know, but some people just need a reminder.

To further support homoloveuality/aloveuality being unnatural, (I have nothing against either) you should pretty much see that humans are built with instincts to survive, part of that being to reproduce. You can't exactly keep your species going if you're not getting a female pregnant/getting pregnant from a male.

Again, I have nothing against either homoloveuals, aloveuals, or anyone else for that matter. I am just stating something that I think makes some sense.

The explanation may seem pretty simple, I know, but some people just need a reminder.

homoloveuality is found in almost all species.  The only species that discriminates against it and calls it unnatural are humans.

ya well tell that to nature




plants reproduce aloveually all the time bitch

Sorry I'm late but, we're not plants...


Sorry I'm late but, we're not plants...
uhhhhh

i'm pretty sure that's the joke?