Author Topic: women can now serve in combat roles  (Read 2394 times)

why would anyone want to?
I can understand wanting to be a pilot or sniper or something
but who wants to be infantry?
I have no idea, but you know how I feel about killing! Ask someone who's infantry.

it's very easy to serve your country without being in combat

No no no only men can still serve their country.

And I know that I was just y'know... Being me. c:

who wants to be infantry?
I wanted to be a tank crewman.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2013, 02:22:06 AM by Harm94 »

why would anyone want to?
I can understand wanting to be a pilot or sniper or something
but who wants to be infantry?it's very easy to serve your country without being in combat



Atleast we don't have mechas piloted by 15 years olds.

Hell on earth, as we know it.

Related:



Out of date with this development.

Bad and stupid idea. We should let children serve in combat too, since we're obviously out to make combat as dangerous as possible for our troops.


Bad and stupid idea. We should let children serve in combat too, since we're obviously out to make combat as dangerous as possible for our troops.
are you kidding me, there's plenty of dumbstuff men in the corps too

Bad and stupid idea. We should let children serve in combat too, since we're obviously out to make combat as dangerous as possible for our troops.
are you anti-everything or do you just love starting stuff?
« Last Edit: January 27, 2013, 04:32:00 AM by Kaphonaits² »

we now have unstoppable war machines
but they only work once a month

An expected change that came way too late.

we now have unstoppable war machines
but they only work once a month
it might not be so bad if they didn't automatically synchronize