Author Topic: Aircraft thread  (Read 5083 times)

I'm sorry, but are you like, loving stupid? The T-50 is a multi-role fighter and a advanced training aircraft. The F-22 is a stealth air superior fighter with advanced weapon systems and stealth capabilities, it also has a farther service range than the T-50, faster speeds, higher service ceiling, and more advanced technologies. Next time you come and say it sucks, please back up your argument.

Not the KAI T-50 Golden Eagle. Sukhoi's PAK FA project T-50 prototype.

And yes, the T-50 could very easily be the "Raptor Killer."

Not the KAI T-50 Golden Eagle. Sukhoi's PAK FA project T-50 prototype.

And yes, the T-50 could very easily be the "Raptor Killer."
Aah. Thank you for at least telling me what the damn thing was instead of continuously saying the T-50 is better rapter sucks.

After reading on both of them. They would come close, I still think the F-22 would win this battle. The F-22 reaches higher speeds and has a better armament. It's back engines are also 'surpressed' with its stealth plating The Pratt and Whitney F119 turbofan engine is also designed for minimum exhaust signature for the best stealth capabilities.



no but seriously the sr71's pretty cool


bumping for DAT ASS.



mack and i were trying to figure out what plane was this, turns out signs point to the f-14 tomcat.


Not the KAI T-50 Golden Eagle. Sukhoi's PAK FA project T-50 prototype.

And yes, the T-50 could very easily be the "Raptor Killer."

It's more like if the U.S. has something the Russians don't, then they have to have it, or the Russians have something the U.S. doesn't then they have to have it.

There's still a minor arms race going on, it's just that rapid aeronautical advances are not happening like they where in the 50's and 60's.

Example, if the U.S had a rail gun that was small enough to fit on a tank, it could be a game changer and the Russians would have to have it themselves to stay technologically equal.

It's more like if the U.S. has something the Russians don't, then they have to have it, or the Russians have something the U.S. doesn't then they have to have it.

There's still a minor arms race going on, it's just that rapid aeronautical advances are not happening like they where in the 50's and 60's.

Example, if the U.S had a rail gun that was small enough to fit on a tank, it could be a game changer and the Russians would have to have it themselves to stay technologically equal.
Basicly what I was thinking. The Russians are playing Kalphiter catch up with the U.S.


Mine is better
[img ]http://www.zurqui.com/crinfocus/paper/dc3.gif[/img]
actually those things fly horribly.



Ride in one of these every 3 months.

[img ]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/737-100_N73700.jpg/800px-737-100_N73700.jpg[/img]

Ride in one of these every 3 months.

oholy stuff yes

i flew into san francisco - late night 7 hour flight from florida - and this is how it looked on the inside



loving awesome stuff, yo.


Look at the size of that thing! It's huge! I've actually been on it before, it lands like a brick.


Good, I wasn't the only one who thought about a flying tank