The Thing pls.
WHAT IS THIS
I see your point here. Even then, science also has to accommodate new discoveries such as that. There was direct evidence in the bible that these days were not literal, even as stated in the Bible itself ("But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day." II Peter 2:3, notice how like is used in the text as a simile and not a literal equation, and also, "For a thousand years in Your sight Are like yesterday when it passes by, Or as a watch in the night." Psalm 90:4), this could easily account for life significantly older than humans, since Humanity was created on the last "day", as opposed to the aquatic animals on the fifth day and the animals on the sixth day. So even if the point for the origin of life was incorrect up to this point, remember that nobody had definite proof of anything past recorded human history, and it was easy to settle for a literal interpretation of a translated text, however the Day-age interpretation is not without biblical support.
[im g]http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpje8uTNoE1r0gxalo1_500.gif[/img]
There are other theories of creationism that aren't young earth
i've been staring at this for like 5 minutes trying to understand WHAT THE forget is happening here
What does this have to do with evolution?
Who knows. But I think these 100,000 year bacteria should be left alone. I'm afraid that they might accidently kill them, or introduce other microbes that will kill them off or change their makeup.
home-grown alien life