Why were blockguy, Cakey and Badger banned?

[Acerblock]

Holy forget what is that bannable i dont know what

User was banned for this post

yea it's useless spam

reported

User was banned for this post

please get banned for this

User was banned for this post

Yes, I know this has been discussed, but to me this is confusing. After looking through these guys' profiles, I found the ban reason.

Sorry AQuietBadger, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum.
One week: Quoting spam in spam

What?? What the hell? I'm sorry, but this is very confusing.

[Ad Bot]

[Pixel]

I was confused too but now in pretty sure that guy had done more in his post than just ">I'm gay"

They probably quoted a wall of spam or a picture or something

[psychomutt]

I was confused too but now in pretty sure that guy had done more in his post than just ">I'm gay"

They probably quoted a wall of spam or a picture or something

you can't edit your posts in drama though.

[Acerblock]

Didn't see anything else in that quote. :\

[Fireboy]

you can't edit your posts in drama though.

but badspot can

[Acerblock]

but badspot can

Well wait, doesn't Badspot add something like <removed> when he edits stuff?

[psychomutt]

but badspot can

oh yeah.

[Bisjac]

well im guessing there are new unwritten rules against provoking/encouraging bans. its kinda spammy and dismissive.

i mean why is it that people feel the need to tell you they reported you. are they waiting for the "haha i told you so" moment? or is it a new game to take credit for someones ban.

[Acerblock]

well im guessing there are new unwritten rules against provoking/encouraging bans. its kinda spammy and dismissive.

i mean why is it that people feel the need to tell you they reported you. are they waiting for the "haha i told you so" moment?

But what the hell does "quoting spam in spam" mean?

[Bisjac]

people who quote banable things, should be themselves banned.
they are only doubling what is against the rules lol

like duh

[Acerblock]

people who quote banable things, should be themselves banned.
they are only doubling what is against the rules lol

like duh

Uuuuoooohhh. But "spam in spam"? Ahh, forget it. The bans are still iffy IMO.

[AlsoSulfate]

They quoted spam, their message was also spam as it contributed nothing thus they were also spamming.

[Acerblock]

They quoted spam, their message was also spam as it contributed nothing thus they were also spamming.

I have seen those kind of posts go unbanned numerous times.

Badspot should at least let us know it's now against the rules.

[AlsoSulfate]

Alternatively people should be less stupid.

[Acerblock]

Alternatively people should be less stupid.

But we haven't seen those kinds of posts get banned, so how should we know?