"Should Barack Obama be impeached?"

[Kimon]

maybe rational back in the 18th century when the constitution was ratified but it would be ridiculous to assume things haven't changed since then

what exactly changed so dramatically?

[Ad Bot]

[Count]

a minimal safety net is good, a huge bloated welfare system is not

I agree on that. The current welfare system seems to promote laziness, more money should be invested in job training.

[Wynd_Fox]

what exactly changed so dramatically?

Um, everything? Communication systems, political ideas, the way business works, infrastructure, social views, etc.

[Kimon]

Um, everything? Communication systems, political ideas, the way business works, infrastructure, social views, etc.

But he's saying it's irrational to continue to support the ideals that were the base of this entire country. Those are all pretty broad associations, do you care to explain what specifically changed about them so much so that those ideas would be irrational now?

[Gojira]

constitutionalism is not crazy, it's the most rational approach to politics in the US

a minimal safety net is good, a huge bloated welfare system is not

i love you

[fred da kiko]

Anyone else think that basing your ideas off of which political party you identify with instead of identifying with a political party because of your ideas is a bit stupid. I see it all the time "I support X because I'm a democrat/republican/whosawhatsit" instead of "I am a democrat because I support X"

It's a bit like liking a certain dish because you ordered it at a restaurant rather than ordering that dish because you like it.

[Dreams_Of_Cheese]

no because black people cant be impeached because white poelpe wrote the contitsions and blacks and whitesa are diferant

[Kimon]

Anyone else think that basing your ideas off of which political party you identify with instead of identifying with a political party because of your ideas is a bit stupid. I see it all the time "I support X because I'm a democrat/republican/whosawhatsit" instead of "I am a democrat because I support X"

It's a bit like liking a certain dish because you ordered it at a restaurant rather than ordering that dish because you like it.

they would probably have to agree with those ideas in the first place to want to consider themselves that....

ok at first it seriously looked like people on twitter were trying to support Obama running for office for 12 years, but-
OH MY loving GOD THEY ARE
OOOOOOOH MY GOD SHOOT ME

[Count]

they would probably have to agree with those ideas in the first place to want to consider themselves that....

ok at first it seriously looked like people on twitter were trying to support Obama running for office for 12 years, but-
OH MY loving GOD THEY ARE
OOOOOOOH MY GOD SHOOT ME
[img]http://i.im

Pretty sure that guys is joking?

[Anti-Block]

Biroc


sounds like a pokemon

[Kimon]

Pretty sure that guys is joking?

No, that's a "retweet" from a guy that said that apparently said that seriously.
I mean I really can't loving tell if they are joking or not i mean look at this WHAT DOES IT EVEN MEAN

Michelle Obama 2016?
I DON'T UNDERSTAND THESE PEOPLE ;_;

[Count]

No, that's a "retweet" from a guy that said that apparently said that seriously.
I mean I really can't loving tell if they are joking or not i mean look at this WHAT DOES IT EVEN MEAN

Michelle Obama 2016?
I DON'T UNDERSTAND THESE PEOPLE ;_;

Why are you so angry though, there are idiots all over the place, especially twitter. Obama isn't going to get another term, and Michelle Obama probably isn't running, and even if she did, I doubt she would win.

[Anti-Block]

hillary clinton 2016

[Kimon]

Why are you so angry though, there are idiots all over the place, especially twitter. Obama isn't going to get another term, and Michelle Obama probably isn't running, and even if she did, I doubt she would win.

I'm not angry I'm just acting silly or whatever. My point was that those idiots did exist.
#TheMoreYouKnow

[Lalam24]

Care to back that up like you never have before?

Because any genuine conservative knows that, statistically speaking, this isn't something to promote:

    67% of Fox viewers believed that the "U.S. has found clear evidence in Iraq that Saddam Hussein was working closely with the al Qaeda terrorist organization" (Compared with 56% for CBS, 49% for NBC, 48% for CNN, 45% for ABC, 16% for NPR/PBS).

    The belief that "The U.S. has found Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq" was held by 33% of Fox viewers and only 23% of CBS viewers, 19% for ABC, 20% for NBC, 20% for CNN and 11% for NPR/PBS

    35% of Fox viewers believed that "the majority of people [in the world] favor the U.S. having gone to war" with Iraq. (Compared with 28% for CBS, 27% for ABC, 24% for CNN, 20% for NBC, 5% for NPR/PBS)