Great job on the comment overall... but...
Can you provide sources/statistics that show that circumcised males are protected/at less of a risk for STDs "significantly"?
I am highly skeptical of this, circumcision comes down to religious practice and serves no purpose other than aesthetics and ease-of-clean, while eliminating hundreds of thousands of highly-sensitive nerve endings (not just regular nerve endings, take two fingers and rub them on the back of your opposite hand, then do the same but on the inside of your palm).