Fireblock (9280): Trust beggar, build deleter, and repeated spamming

[Zeblote]

So why waste time taking pictures and stuff instead of permanently banning him after wanding the first brick?

[Ad Bot]

[Dreams_Of_Cheese]

So why waste time taking pictures and stuff instead of permanently banning him after wanding the first brick?

[Plexious]

You let him destroy your build just so you could post a drama on him?

[hammereditor²]

Wait so, instead of BANNING him, you let him destroy everything that you KNOW you didn't save just so you could take screenshots?
You do know you could have banned him after he destroyed one thing and then took pics of the chat/part that he deleted AFTER he was banned, right?

Some of this was your fault too.
Why would you do (What was stated above); and why did you give him trust instead of just banning him after he kept spamming you with invites...

What.

#1: ALL of the logged chat above was before he came to the server.
#2: I already had a save of the build in 2 places.

[hammereditor²]

Sorry for double-posting, but:
I already had the build saved in 2 different places.

[Acerblock]

BUT WHY DIDN'T YOU BAN HIM

[Orion]

BUT WHY DIDN'T YOU BAN HIM

WHY

[hammereditor²]

BUT WHY DIDN'T YOU BAN HIM

Right when he left, I had to go and didn't have time.
Today I banned him.

[Zeblote]

WHY DIDN'TYOU INSTANT BAN HIM WHEN HE STARTED WANDING

[Evan5626]

#1: ALL of the logged chat above was before he came to the server.
#2: I already had a save of the build in 2 places.

You still didn't answer why didn't you ban him right when he started wanding.

This drama is pointless, you GAVE him trust and ALLOWED him to destroy your bricks without banning him just so you could post a drama.
Really.

[hammereditor²]

WHY DIDN'TYOU INSTANT BAN HIM WHEN HE STARTED WANDING

I wanted to capture evidence of Fireblock's build deleting, so I could make this topic.

[Zeblote]

I wanted to capture evidence of Fireblock's build deleting, so I could make this topic.

So you wanted to set up a trap for someone just to post a drama full of stuff that wouldn't have happened if you reacted right?

[hammereditor²]

So you wanted to set up a trap for someone just to post a drama full of stuff that wouldn't have happened if you reacted right?

I did not create a scheme just to use somebody for a drama topic. He first begged for trust, joined my server,(he was already an auto admin from a week ago), and started destruco wanding the build.
He never had build or full trust from me since I bought Blockland.
Fireblock used his deleting in order to make me give him trust.

[Evan5626]

I did not create a scheme just to use somebody for a drama topic. He first begged for trust, joined my server,(he was already an auto admin from a week ago), and started destruco wanding the build.
He never had build or full trust from me since I bought Blockland.
Fireblock used his deleting in order to make me give him trust.

You did create a trap.
Instead of banning him then and there, you sat and took pictures while he was doing it so you could make a drama over something that could have never happened.

This was your fault mostly.

"I had to get evidence"- you wouldn't have to get evidence if you would've just banned him before he destroyed everything and re-loaded the save.

[Klocko²]

I actually saw this happen in real time on Hammer's monitor

Wait, what? Did you visit Hammer?