There IS no point in commenting about a video if you have to watch it for 4 hours. That's insane.
Yet here you are.
Other than the fact that people saw the planes fly into the buildings, as well as had phone calls with people on the last plane who said that there was a terrorist on board controlling the plane.
If you know anything about this, you know there were a lot of people who didn't see any planes. Recordings of phone calls don't prove anything other than the fact that those words were spoken by someone.
THOSE WERE PAID ACTORS DUH.
Will you explain yourself soon?
9/11 was not a nuclear demolition
wtc7 collapsed in a fashion identical to conventional explosive devices used to collapse other buildings
i would assume a nuclear demolition would appear different.
A nuclear demolition would turn skyscrapers into dust, as with 9/11.
How could there be a nuclear detonation? Other than the fact that Manhattan would be near enough destroyed, The area around the crumbled WTC would be radioactive, which it clearly isn't.
Dimitri talks about these things, you know. I'm not an expert - he is. Although, it's kind of funny how you think mountain rock and air will react the same way to a nuclear explosion.
There is no way to argue with people that buy into stuffty conspiracies. They already have no basic reasoning skill because they loving believe in a conspiracy theory.
Again, if you believe 2 or more people to somehow be behind this (e.g. the hijackers), then you believe in a conspiracy.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conspiracyIf any of this was true why aren't the people that try to spread the so called "truth" killed? How is the government so powerful and all that, but still so incompetent.
Why would anyone bother with that when 99% just believe whatever they're told anyway?
A sane person and a loving nutjob like you have very different ideas of what solid evidence is. Nobody will listen to them because they're loving crazy.
You're not even saying anything at this point
