Author Topic: Dimitri Khalezov explains WTC nuclear demolition 9/11/2001  (Read 8437 times)

I watched the entire video and it was complete bs

it says in the title. Dimitri Khalezov explains how they could have demolished the three buildings. .
Plausibility /=/ probability.

Probability /=/ reality.

I'm not going to watch the video simply because every single conspiracy theorist operates on the same thought process of removing context from evidence and focusing more on the plausibility of a situation than the evidence pointing towards it. If you literally believe that the US government or whoever collapsed the World Trade Center towers using a nuclear bomb, you are a loving handicap and no amount of me pointing out the casuistry and fallacies within your arguments will change that."But sev, I said the word 'truth' at least 25 times!"

Have fun being a deluded moron, Nymethus.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2013, 07:09:55 AM by SeventhSandwich »

Nymethus deactivated his Facebook. No idea if this topic has anything to do with that.

I havent watched the video because Im on my phone, and yeah, 4 hours is pretty loving long, but youre all being starfishs to OP.

Plausibility /=/ probability.

Probability /=/ reality.

I'm not going to watch the video simply because every single conspiracy theorist operates on the same thought process of removing context from evidence and focusing more on the plausibility of a situation than the evidence pointing towards it. If you literally believe that the US government or whoever collapsed the World Trade Center towers using a nuclear bomb, you are a loving handicap and no amount of me pointing out the casuistry and fallacies within your arguments will change that."But sev, I said the word 'truth' at least 25 times!"

Have fun being a deluded moron, Nymethus.


thank you.

-asfa-
I didn't claim the theory to be reality. You're functioning solely on popular belief right now.

Nymethus deactivated his Facebook. No idea if this topic has anything to do with that.
It doesn't. Ask me via PM next time.
Also, stop posting here if you're not going to say anything.

It seems most of you in here are way more concerned about this than me, yet you won't watch the video about it. Most of you claim to know everything (not sure how you would) beforehand even though you don't know what's in the video. What can I say, you seem to let popular belief control you.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2013, 09:31:41 AM by Nymethus »

I watched the entire video and it was complete bs
I watched the video for 20 minutes and could tell that.

I watched the entire video and it was complete bs

God bless your stamina

I watched the video for 20 minutes and could tell that.
but you won't tell us why you think so. this is what I don't get.

Woah, man.

What if, like, the government is, like, trying to take our weed away so we can't see through their national socialist, Communist lies.

What if like, they take your left sock from the dryer.

And then, they used all the left socks to like, blow up the World Trade Center.

Dude, it's all George Bush's fault!

Vote Jill Stein 2014!

but you won't tell us why you think so. this is what I don't get.
People seem to deem certain things as unquestionable. (for better or worse)
This seems obvious, but you should really expect nothing more than "but dude i thought you were better than this" responces.

I didn't claim the theory to be reality. You're functioning solely on popular belief right now.
Yeah, the reason I follow the 'official story' isn't because it's extremely well substantiated. I just believe it because everyone else does!



The fallacy in Nymethus' reasoning is that he's assuming that people consider the 'official story' true entirely because it's predominantly popular. What he's missing is all the evidence that points to the 'official story' being true.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2013, 07:48:28 PM by SeventhSandwich »

Again, if you believe 2 or more people to somehow be behind this (e.g. the hijackers), then you believe in a conspiracy.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conspiracy
Conspiracy theory: a theory that explains an event or set of circumstances as the result of a secret plot by usually powerful conspirators (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy%20theory)

Stop ignoring context and playing stupid in order to make a point about an "invalid" use of a word.

Conspiracy theory: a theory that explains an event or set of circumstances as the result of a secret plot by usually powerful conspirators (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy%20theory)

Stop ignoring context and playing stupid in order to make a point about an "invalid" use of a word.
He's just trying to make his crazy bullstuff appear rational.

From now on, treat the term 'conspiracy theory' as synonymous with 'government conspiracy theory'. At least within the context of this thread.

If you cant handle the fact that two entire jumbo jets actually flew into a freaking building and killed two thousand good people, even when there is actual video evidence (dont give me that "oh its four hours long it has enough" B.S.), you shouldn't be discussing the subject at all. (directed towards OP)