Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

[Steve5451²]

oh don't beat around the bush, it's a suggestive picture of a   ing kid and you know damn well what that picture wants to implywh-

but jerking off to anthropomorphic animals isn't zoophilia, so why would that child enthusiasm? Get this crazy fact, you're not going to believe it, ready? this is insane, okay: most people who like loli aren't child enthusiasts. Not the slightest bit. It's the same as how most furries aren't zoophiles. But you can twist the reasoning to better suit your situation all day.

[Ad Bot]

[Frontrox]

[takato14]

Look at that camera angle, it's probably intended, considering that several users found it hot.

or maybe the artist wanted to try a difficult camera angle

idk

but jerking off to anthropomorphic animals isn't zoophilia, so why would that child enthusiasm? Get this crazy fact, you're not going to believe it, ready? this is insane, okay: most people who like loli aren't child enthusiasts. Not the slightest bit. It's the same as how most furries aren't zoophiles. But you can twist the reasoning to better suit your situation all day.

well it depends on how you're defining "zoophile" and "child enthusiast" but otherwise this is relatively accurate

[Zanaran2]

but jerking off to anthropomorphic animals isn't zoophilia, so why would that child enthusiasm? Get this crazy fact, you're not going to believe it, ready? this is insane, okay: most people who like loli aren't child enthusiasts. Not the slightest bit. It's the same as how most furries aren't zoophiles. But you can twist the reasoning to better suit your situation all day.

Basically this. According to your stellar logic, people who enjoy shooting games would be more than happy to shoot up schools, and people who play fighting games would be glad to go around town whaling on people.

[Flatflyer]

okay front you're getting verrrryyyy risky with that pic there

[Frontrox]

okay front you're getting verrrryyyy risky with that pic there

He's in his underwear

[takato14]

okay front you're getting verrrryyyy risky with that pic there

He's in his underwear

[*FacePalm*]

most people who like loli aren't child enthusiasts. Not the slightest bit.

YES THEY ARE ALL THE WAY jesus absolute forget
the thing about furries is that they're (at least the ones is question) matured, sentient beings. they're just humans with fur, essentially, so the same morals apply - the ones who would like them because they're animals would get off to animals.
people who like loli get off to loli because they're children and it's forgeted up and incredibly creepy. im loving done because you're loving defending loli. jesus forget.

[Zanaran2]

He's in his underwear

Doesn't that completely destroy the purpose of the loincloth?

[Frontrox]

Doesn't that completely destroy the purpose of the loincloth?

It covers the bulge

[Ninja Decoy]

YES THEY ARE ALL THE WAY jesus absolute forget
the thing about furries is that they're (at least the ones is question) matured, sentient beings. they're just humans with fur, essentially, so the same morals apply - the ones who would like them because they're animals would get off to animals.
people who like loli get off to loli because they're children and it's forgeted up and incredibly creepy. im loving done because you're loving defending loli. jesus forget.

According to your stellar logic, people who enjoy shooting games would be more than happy to shoot up schools, and people who play fighting games would be glad to go around town whaling on people.

[Steve5451²]

YES THEY ARE ALL THE WAY jesus absolute 
the thing about furries is that they're (at least the ones is question) matured, sentient beings. they're just humans with fur, essentially, so the same morals apply - the ones who would like them because they're animals would get off to animals.
people who like loli get off to loli because they're children and it's  ed up and incredibly creepy. im  ing done because you're  ing defending loli. jesus  .

Then what makes a furry attractive other than being based off an animal?
They're not called anthropomorphic animals for nothing.
Yes, child enthusiasts are bound to like loli just as zoophiles are bound to like furries, but it doesn't always work the other way around.
A square is a rectangle but a rectangle is not always a square.

[Flatflyer]

YES THEY ARE ALL THE WAY jesus absolute forget
the thing about furries is that they're (at least the ones is question) matured, sentient beings. they're just humans with fur, essentially, so the same morals apply - the ones who would like them because they're animals would get off to animals.
people who like loli get off to loli because they're children and it's forgeted up and incredibly creepy. im loving done because you're loving defending loli. jesus forget.

and here we see the facepalm turtling back into its shell after failing to fight back.

He's in his underwear

i'm more referring to the visible crotch hair

[Steve5451²]

i'm more referring to the visible crotch hair

actually yeah, that is pretty risky.

[Frontrox]

i'm more referring to the visible crotch hair

Its in that area around what looks like a belly button.

So its more of a happy trail than anything else