Author Topic: COD:Ghosts Vs Battlefield 4  (Read 5633 times)

Bullstuff, IE COD: No noticeable recoil, kill everything by just shooting at it for 10 minutes on end, gamebreaking killstreaks that stack, if you get 3-4 kills in a row you know where everybody who isn't moving is, easy camping, headshots that don't matter, secondaries beat the primaries, assault rifles are jack of all trades master of none, submachineguns are death machines, rpgs are used as primaries, unbreakable plastic shields, incredible weapon misbalance (the colt 1911 in black ops had worse stats than ANY of the other pistols in the game. same with the ak47.)

Okay, IE BF3: Actual recoil, destructible environments that somewhat succeed at preventing camping, vehicles that are not vulnerable to bullets, no killstreaks, just vehicles, headshots do substantial damage, assault rifles have almost the best qualities of all of the guns, submachineguns are bad at range but good in cqc, better customization, larger, clearer maps, balanced explosives like rpgs, no adamantium shields, and good weapon balance.

are you telling him he's not allowed to have fun just because you don't like cod? forget off lol

does it matter if cod takes no skill? I wasn't aware being super pro at games was the only way to have fun.

are you telling him he's not allowed to have fun just because you don't like cod? forget off lol

does it matter if cod takes no skill? I wasn't aware being super pro at games was the only way to have fun.
i'm telling him he's not allowed to brag about "owning everyone else" because COD takes no skill you thick forgetwit.

i'm telling him he's not allowed to brag about "owning everyone else" because COD takes no skill you thick forgetwit.

right .. he's not allowed to brag about a game he's seemingly good at, because you said so, and you think it takes no skill ..

go forget yourself.

Bullstuff, IE COD: No noticeable recoil, kill everything by just shooting at it for 10 minutes on end, gamebreaking killstreaks that stack, if you get 3-4 kills in a row you know where everybody who isn't moving is, easy camping, headshots that don't matter, secondaries beat the primaries, assault rifles are jack of all trades master of none, submachineguns are death machines, rpgs are used as primaries, unbreakable plastic shields, incredible weapon misbalance (the colt 1911 in black ops had worse stats than ANY of the other pistols in the game. same with the ak47.)

Okay, IE BF3: Actual recoil, destructible environments that somewhat succeed at preventing camping, vehicles that are not vulnerable to bullets, no killstreaks, just vehicles, headshots do substantial damage, assault rifles have almost the best qualities of all of the guns, submachineguns are bad at range but good in cqc, better customization, larger, clearer maps, balanced explosives like rpgs, no adamantium shields, and good weapon balance.
CoD may not be perfect, but it's no authentic war simulator. Its supposed to be a fast-paced arcade shooter. That why there's killstreaks and RPG's and stuff. BF has its vehicles and tactics but i'd rather slaughter people over on flag B than get shot a few times and spend minutes trying to get back to the frontlines.

CoD may not be perfect, but it's no authentic war simulator. Its supposed to be a fast-paced arcade shooter. That why there's killstreaks and RPG's and stuff. BF has its vehicles and tactics but i'd rather slaughter people over on flag B than get shot a few times and spend minutes trying to get back to the frontlines.
too bad it sucks at being arcade too

too bad it sucks at being arcade too
I'm sorry it doesn't conform to your overly high standards. I still like it though,.

right .. he's not allowed to brag about a game he's seemingly good at, because you said so, and you think it takes no skill ..

go forget yourself.
right .. i'm not allowed to tell him he not allowed to brag about winning in a game that takes no skill ..

go forget yourself.

COD is bullstuff. To some people it's fun bullstuff. For me it's just bullstuff.

COD is bullstuff. To some people it's fun bullstuff. For me it's just bullstuff.
Just because you don't like it doesn't really mean its bullstuff.

Unless you mean the SMG's in bo2. Those are loving dumb.

right .. i'm not allowed to tell him he not allowed to brag about winning in a game that takes no skill ..

go forget yourself.

uh, yes, correct. you are not the only person in the world and a lot of people could argue that CoD does take some degree of skill (however wrong they may be is up to opinion)

if he's having fun, and he likes playing, naturally he will play more, and build ... skill. there is such thing as skill level in cod.

cod is for picking up and playing a fast match and having fun. bf3 is "more realistic" and prettier, and yes more heavily based on mechanics.

in the end, you're just a douchebag who is mad that someone doesn't prefer BF3. you're mad because he likes something that you think is stuff, and he's good at it, too.

get over yourself, you are a massive tool, congratulations.

COD is bullstuff. To some people it's fun bullstuff. For me it's just bullstuff.

right .. i'm not allowed to tell him he not allowed to brag about winning in a game that takes no skill ..

go forget yourself.

Why do you have to get so worked up over things that you dislike :(, just chill out dude.

why do people think battlefield is better because its more realistic
realism isnt really always that important/fun
god loving damn they are games they aren't supposed to all be like super realistic recoil and whatnot

god loving damn they are games they aren't supposed to all be like super realistic recoil and whatnot
being a game doesn't mean you should be unrealistic lol

being a game doesn't mean you should be unrealistic lol
likewise, being a game doesnt mean you have to be realistic.

can we all take a second to imagine how boring a realistic shooter would be

you get shot. you fall over and bleed out. that's it, because you died.