Author Topic: Women to fight in America's elite military units  (Read 13313 times)

I honestly dont give a forget. If a woman has what it takes to join the army then they should!

This is what any respectable person should think, and I would fully support a system that holds everyone to the same ideals and tests. However, there are quotas for minorities, and that is what is unfair and stuffty.

In defense of the op your usual special forces team ranges from 4-8 guys. So every man counts and if some one gets wounded badly that requires you to carry him(or soon to be her) to safety which means either one person has to carry them or two people. Now if there are plenty of guys in the squad I'm sure one of the boys can carry them.

But what if its a 4 man with 2 women and 2 men and one of the men needs to be carried? It would probably be better to have women do sniper work like what the Russians did in ww2 with all woman squads.

Watch them get captured and compromise everything while being tortured

yaaaaaay gender biased ignorance.

ITT: loveism

I suggest turning around

EDIT:

forget this thread. Some people in here desperately need a reality check.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2013, 11:45:06 AM by Toothed Deer »

Giving people with unstable emotions and rationality secret intel would be a bad move.

ITT: loveism

I suggest turning around
Have you served in the military?

In defense of the op your usual special forces team ranges from 4-8 guys. So every man counts and if some one gets wounded badly that requires you to carry him(or soon to be her) to safety which means either one person has to carry them or two people. Now if there are plenty of guys in the squad I'm sure one of the boys can carry them.

But what if its a 4 man with 2 women and 2 men and one of the men needs to be carried?
The fact that the two women are even in the team should make their adequacy in this kind of situation obvious. Just because she's a woman, that doesn't make her automatically weak. The point you're trying to make here is completely null and void.

Guys, we aren't 10. Girls aren't little sissies and they don't have cooties. Gender roles are gone, grow the forget up.

Ok but I'm gonna laugh when these women start dropping like flies lol

I don't really see what women could bring to the table that would make it worth while.
Maybe if there is some big lack of personnel then sure whatever but is there any reason to go around adding women into the equation?

ITT: loveism

I suggest turning around

EDIT:

forget this thread. Some people in here desperately need a reality check.
You do realize that women on average are a lot less physically capable than men? Sure, there can be women strong enough to be a soldier, but they would be rarer than men serving in combat. That isn't loveism, that's having the best available soldiers so the minimum amount of lives are lost. What is "correct" isn't always true.


affirmative action with the US navy seals

okay now to be completely serious
It's no secret that women aren't as physically capable as men.
If a group wants the best of the best, then screw equal rights. If a woman proves to be stronger and more levelheaded than all other candidates, then by all means take her in. But men mostly have the upper hand and taking a woman in just to "be fair" is bullstuff.


ok is she signing up..?

Did I say that?

I was just showing what a woman could do.