Author Topic: Pure, unadulterated rage.  (Read 7436 times)

I didn't say you were.
Oh generalizations. Silly me skipping over lines. Yes the democrats were supporters of slavery back then. However the parties changed places in the political spectrum around the 1960's. Anyway while the platform's changed, it's still a black mark on the party. 
« Last Edit: June 29, 2013, 09:21:20 PM by Harm94 »

The democrats in the US were strong supporters of slavery in the 1860's, the democrats in the north called the copperheads protested the union waging war on the south.
This is satire right? Or are you using more of your 'thinly-veiled sarcasm'?

I'm being serious and reminding the democrat supporters that once upon a time they did not stand for civil rights and would be referred too as "conservatards" as most Republican bashers are. Meanwhile the Republicans continue to make themselves look like fools by calling Obama the antichrist.

What Democrats/Republicans used to support is 100% irrelevant.

If this asshat stopped supporting companies that stood up for LGBT rights, they'd be living in a mud hut in a field somewhere.
No they'd be living in Chick-fil-a.

What Democrats/Republicans used to support is 100% irrelevant.
I don't know. Would you support the kool kids klub ten years from now if they became a civil rights group?

I'm being serious and reminding the democrat supporters that once upon a time they did not stand for civil rights and would be referred too as "conservatards" as most Republican bashers are. Meanwhile the Republicans continue to make themselves look like fools by calling Obama the antichrist.
Dude, it's just a name. If I refer to myself as a democrat and I support civil rights, that doesn't make me a hypocrite because the US bipartisan had a polar shift in regards to civil rights and economic policy 150 years ago. Are you loving handicapped?

I don't know. Would you support the kool kids klub ten years from now if they became a civil rights group?
Okay so now we're equating democrats with the kool kids klub. I guess that answers my last question.

Their views changed harm.
Democrats are atleast more supportive than Conservative Republicans.

the civil war of gays vs americannss

"I'm gonna loving kill you you loving friend."

"Oh, aren't you big and strong~"


We're documenting this live - the civil war of republican friends vs. op.

OP what do you say about these hate crimes?


Their views changed harm.
Democrats are atleast more supportive than Conservative Republicans.
I already knew that, but
I don't know. Would you support the kool kids klub ten years from now if they became a civil rights group?
Just think for a second. I expect SeventhSandwich and Dkamm65 to reply with "the past is irrelevant".  If the parties previous past is irreverent too Sandwich then he can forget everything I said a few minutes ago since that is now is the past. Like I said, hypocrites.

I already knew that, butJust think for a second. I expect SeventhSandwich and Dkamm65 to reply with "the past is irrelevant".  If the parties previous past is irreverent too Sandwich then he can forget everything I said a few minutes ago since that is now is the past. Like I said, hypocrites.
You're equating a political party (Democrats) with an organized hate group (kool kids klub). If I am a democrat, it's because I support social and economic policies held by the democratic party. It's not because I support policies that were held by the democratic party 150 years ago. Unlike hate groups, political parties change over time because it's the nature of politics. The kool kids klub was founded to organize groups of people who want to terrorize black people and ethnically cleanse America. This will always be the kool kids klub's position. Is this really that hard to understand?

You're equating a political party (Democrats) with an organized hate group (kool kids klub). If I am a democrat, it's because I support social and economic policies held by the democratic party. It's not because I support policies that were held by the democratic party 150 years ago. Unlike hate groups, political parties change over time because it's the nature of politics. The kool kids klub was founded to organize groups of people who want to terrorize black people and ethnically cleanse America. This will always be the kool kids klub's position. Is this really that hard to understand?
Yet the black mark on their history is there. Also you left out the part were the first kool kids klub terrorized republican politicians.

Yet the black mark on their history is there. Also you left out the part were the first kool kids klub terrorized republican politicians.
Okay, let me say this again. The democratic party does not support the same policies it did 150 years ago. You can't attack people who join a political party on the basis that they used to support contradictory policies centuries ago. This is brown townogous to blaming modern Christians for the crusades or blaming modern Jewish people for killing Jesus. Does this explain it better?