Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

[tkepahama]

I'm not saying what they're doing isn't bad, I'm saying they aren't doing it with malicious intentions.

Ok, but my point still stands.

[Ad Bot]

[Yenola]

Ok, but my point still stands.

I understand that but as does mine.

You don't call someone who parked illegally a terrorist.

[Plexious]

Of course they have malicious intentions. That's all what they do.

[Blockzillahead]

I understand that but as does mine.

You don't call someone who parked illegally a terrorist.

Actually yes you can, because in this case that terrorist terrorized people before. So it's safe to say that he's trying to terrorize people again when he breaks the law again.

[King of the Bill]

Dotdot and Computermix claimed they did it for the challenge and the thrill. I'm a bit suspicious, of course.

[Yenola]

Of course they have malicious intentions. That's all what they do.

You can't simply say that because someone has a bad reputation that they factually have to do something, that's not logical.

Actually yes you can, because in this case that terrorist terrorized people before. So it's safe to say that he's trying to terrorize people again when he breaks the law again.

The only thing I've seen dotdot actually do, and have proof of doing so, is dox'ing people.  Badspot dox'd me, so by your logic Badspot is also a terrorist?

[Blockzillahead]

You can't simply say that because someone has a bad reputation that they factually have to do something, that's not logical.
The only thing I've seen dotdot actually do, and have proof of doing so, is dox'ing people.  Badspot dox'd me, so by your logic Badspot is also a terrorist?

Wasn't talking about dox'ing. I was talking about malicious codes.

[Yenola]

Wasn't talking about dox'ing. I was talking about malicious codes.

The only thing I've seen dotdot actually do, and have proof of doing so, is dox'ing people.

[King of the Bill]

You can't simply say that because someone has a bad reputation that they factually have to do something, that's not logical.
The only thing I've seen dotdot actually do, and have proof of doing so, is dox'ing people.  Badspot dox'd me, so by your logic Badspot is also a terrorist?

You obv missed the posts where Eepos and I talked about the attempted decompilation. and how Dotdot and Computermix worked together on that stuff.
Also Dotdot is, by definition, a terrorist, because he threatened badspot with releasing his name, home, and phone number.

[Yenola]

You obv missed the posts where Eepos and I talked about the attempted decompilation. and how Dotdot and Computermix worked together on that stuff.
Also Dotdot is, by definition, a terrorist, because he threatened badspot with releasing his name, home, and phone number.

I didn't miss anything.  Decompiling =/= malicious

And Badspot DID release my private information because he didn't get what he wanted, so he is now a terrorist?

[Dreams_Of_Cheese]

I didn't miss anything.  Decompiling =/= malicious

And Badspot DID release my private information because he didn't get what he wanted, so he is now a terrorist?

And you only threatened to call the authorities, what? Three or four times?

[Yenola]

And you only threatened to call the authorities, what? Three or four times?

That made no sense and no actually I haven't, but goooood try!

[otto-san]

There's a difference between saying, "Hey, look at this cool thing I injected into the game that lets me ruin the experience for other players! Isn't it neat?" and saying, "Hey, look at this cool thing I injected into the game that lets me ruin the experience for other players! Isn't it neat? Want it?"
Even if there isn't some kind of key-nabbing/account hijacking code in the background.

Dotdot and Computermix claimed they did it for the challenge and the thrill.

I don't think that needs to be claimed. I'm sure they're getting their fill of the latter, too.

It's comparable to seeing how many of your neighbor's dogs you can abuse before getting caught just for kicks. (as far as the sought-after rush goes, the situation obviously isn't very similar)

[Plexious]

You can't simply say that because someone has a bad reputation that they factually have to do something, that's not logical.

Actually you can. If somebody goes to jail for committing murder they can't get a job as a daycare worker.

[Yenola]

Actually you can. If somebody goes to jail for committing murder they can't get a job as a daycare worker.

That brown townogy doesn't apply.

Because someone goes to jail for murder doesn't mean the second they get out they're going to go kill someone.