poll: castrating known child enthusiasts

[Frankie²]

really want to know what you guys think of this

[Ad Bot]

[Shell]

what in the forget

[Bisjac]

being even a convicted child enthusiast is still very different then a child rapist.

you guys have odd thoughts about punishing people.

[Kaiiu]

yep. they're all scum

[Decepticon]

i voted yes for the hell of it

[dkamm65]

No because then Clone would be castrated.

[Blockzillahead]

just cuz they child enthusiasts dont mean they had love with kids lol

[psychomutt]

seems pretty unnecessary.

[Zloff]

*molesters

[AromaniaFTW]

hehe no nutz no glory

[Muzzles56]

No because then Clone would be castrated.

and vertzer
wait how do i feel about this

[blazerblock2]

that won't stop them from doing the nasty

infact that's encouragement if anything, because now they don't need condoms.

[sir dooble]

I'd just go a more humane yet stricter step and put down capital punishment for convicted child rapists.

Castrating someone is slightly too barbaric.
It wouldn't even put a full stop to the problem.


Castrated people are still loveually active. Why do you think some men in married families will be castrated?
It's to stop them from having children.
They can still have love, want love and enjoy love.

It would do nothing in regards to preventing a paedophile from wanting to have love with a child.
The only benefit castration would even have is likely lost on a paedophile as the child wasn't necesarilly likely to get pregnant anyway. Either being too young or the wrong gender.


And beyond paedophiles continuing to be able to have love with children, it wouldn't prevent such things as grooming or setting up paedophile rings.
This punishment does nothing to stop paedophiles and is just a way of making yourself happy in the light of another persons suffering.
Therefore it's just sadistic.

[Niff]

child enthusiasts are strange people.

Nay

[RaR]

That's not going to fix the problem?