Poll

well?

heteroloveual
213 (68.9%)
homoloveual
28 (9.1%)
biloveual
35 (11.3%)
panloveaul
12 (3.9%)
polyloveual
3 (1%)
aloveual
10 (3.2%)
zoophilia
8 (2.6%)

Total Members Voted: 309

Author Topic: Poll - loveual orientation  (Read 20667 times)

im so incredibly straight, that its kinda gay.

im so incredibly straight, that its kinda gay.
would you say you're as straight as a curved line

Taboo

love is the biological thing between your legs.

Gender is the thing that you identify as. Gender identification.
There are 3 lovees: Male, Female, Interlove
There are many genders. Namely interlove and transgendered individuals are affected by those non-binary genders.


Yes, that does imply that I am biloveual. What I meant by it was when I look at a person I don't think about whether they're male or female, I think about who they are and what they look like. There's more to it than just being biloveual, in my head I'm just interpreting everyone as, "people."
Right now I'm interpreting you as a massive prick.
You seem to be more of a panloveual to me.

I hate dudes, but I am pretty feminine. I am set as straight because I love females.

I hate dudes, but I am pretty feminine. I am set as straight because I love females.
That doesn't effect your loveual orientation. Being feminine is a gender roles. Society decides these factors, most likely males are placed with masculinity, and females with femininity, but that is a spectrum too.

From what I've seen, girls love me for it.

Yes, that does imply that I am biloveual. What I meant by it was when I look at a person I don't think about whether they're male or female, I think about who they are and what they look like. There's more to it than just being biloveual, in my head I'm just interpreting everyone as, "people."
Right now I'm interpreting you as a massive prick.
That would be panloveual


You seem to be more of a panloveual to me.

That would be panloveual


That's why I said, "imply," lol. I am panloveual.

Taboo, the fact that you don't even think there are studies on loveuality or genders pretty much proves that you're pulling arguments out of your own arse.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_gender
http://disinfo.com/2013/03/third-fourth-and-fifth-genders-in-cultures-around-the-world/
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=4588

For forgets sake, there's even a book about it.
http://www.amazon.com/Changing-Ones-Fourth-Genders-America/dp/0312224796

All you do is link stuff.
That doesn't confirm what you're linking is factual at all.

I could link a thousand sources saying that biloveuality and homoloveuality are just fads and aren't natural.

Truth is, no one really knows for sure. I believe it's a fad personally, and I don't like it. It's one of societies current problems.

All you do is link stuff.
That doesn't confirm what you're linking is factual at all.

I could link a thousand sources saying that biloveuality and homoloveuality are just fads and aren't natural.

Truth is, no one really knows for sure. I believe it's a fad personally, and I don't like it. It's one of societies current problems.
I definitely agree with you, Pandan. With the way it's treat, it's not so hard to believe it be true.

All you do is link stuff.
That doesn't confirm what you're linking is factual at all.

I could link a thousand sources saying that biloveuality and homoloveuality are just fads and aren't natural.

Truth is, no one really knows for sure. I believe it's a fad personally, and I don't like it. It's one of societies current problems.

Why do you think its a fad? Why? Because it "exploded" recently in the past 10 years? Maybe that's because it was condemned, just like interracial marriages, or being a jew in the 1940's Germany, or any other irrational hatred that we've come out of in the past century. And tacking on Taboo's argument: Why aren't there that many older gay folk? Maybe because its being more accepted today than it ever was. Its so typical of people like you to condemn things new and "radical" because change is bad. We just can't move forwards as a society because people are just so stuck in the past.

1960's: Oh we're giving black people rights now?
2013: Oh we're giving gays rights now?

Im sure you could go back to when being black made you be considered "inhuman", subordinate, and "unnatural", and people would say "Well doctors have found lots of reasons why blacks aren't really human!" or some stuff like that.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2013, 11:17:39 PM by ShadowsfeaR »

also homoloveuality has been observed in civilizations like ancient china (before christians came and demonized the practice) and ancient rome

It's one of societies current problems.
so is overpopulation, you should be thanking homoloveuals