Author Topic: Gamestop must be handicapped.  (Read 3779 times)

a monopoly is the "exclusive control of a commodity or service in a particular market, or a control that makes possible the manipulation of prices"
I did look it up, but it's exactly what I thought it was

anyway, gamestop is not in control the used game market is what I'm saying
and it never will be
"exclusive control of a commodity or service in a particular market, or a control that makes possible the manipulation of prices"

Are you kidding me?

Do you.. read?
Like.. I don't even understand what you are arguing here...  You're so blatantly wrong it hurts me that you're still arguing this

gamestop is not in control of the used game market is what I'm saying
and it never will be

Yenola, GameStop is not a singular location providing used games. It is a single retailer involved in the business. How they price used games has no effect on other retailers, as other retailers can price better. Even as physical retailers vs virtual, they don't set a standard by which they control pricing in that way.

Point being, people can see when they price wrong and simple go elsewhere where it is fair. They have no control over global pricing for used games because, at times, they must price worse than other retailers. They do not have a monopoly.

oh for forgets sake would you kids just loving read.

I'm not using monopoly in the context of a certain business within a market being the only business in that market.

I'm using it in a context of a certain type or business having its hands in two markets, therefore having control of the prices.

Please, before you argue a loving point, know what you are talking about.

Now, if you cannot understand that, please dismiss the rest of what I'm going to say, exit this thread, and then either educate yourself and come back, or don't do either.



GameStop, and any other game retailer that deals in both used and new games markets, have the ability to price both new and used games.  This means, because they make more money from used games (this is proven, suck my richard if you think otherwise), they are going to push for used games as their major sales.  That's why every time you buy a new game they offer you the used version.

When they buy games for so low, then sell for near manufacturer price, manufacturers start looking at the fact they can be making more money, so they increase the price.  It's a never ending cycle of games going up in price, why do you think Microsoft originally wanted to forget up the used game market?  Because all it's doing is hurting them as a company.

If there were two different retailers for new games and used games, this would never be an issue.

oh for forgets sake would you kids just loving read.
you're only two years older than me, and mega is older than you
I'm not using monopoly in the context of a certain business within a market being the only business in that market.
I'm using it in a context of a certain type or business having its hands in two markets, therefore having control of the prices.
gamestop controls its prices
it does not control the prices of the entire used game market
so, there is no problem resulting from it, unless you make the stupid decision of selling games to gamestop

it does not control the prices of the entire used game market
so, there is no problem resulting from it, unless you make the stupid decision of selling games to gamestop
I was using kid in a conversation context, not by it's belittling context, please try to take context into account from now on when you read things, it can make large differences.

aaand, once again I can see you blatantly either, didn't read, or didn't comprehend what I said, so therefore I cannot argue with you as you don't even know what you're arguing over, you're just spewing some random froth.


I was using kid in a conversation context, not by it's belittling context, please try to take context into account from now on when you read things, it can make large differences.
sure you were
aaand, once again I can see you blatantly either, didn't read, or didn't comprehend what I said, so therefore I cannot argue with you as you don't even know what you're arguing over, you're just spewing some random froth.
no
gamestop doesn't have a monopoly

no
gamestop doesn't have a monopoly
sure gamestop doesn't have a monopoly, but who's to stop them from taking as much as they can (at least for console games)?

yenola is right

GameStop prices based on their ability to serve demand. Low demand in combination with low ability to serve demand means low price they can offer when offered supply. However, other services for used product can combat low demand with better ability to serve to it, so they can offer better prices. GameStop is a bad example in terms of used games, and can not manipulate overall pricing due to its limited ability to serve demand. You could say other services laugh at GameStop's inability and they definitely price better. Of course the individual consumer is the top of this chain.

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.

sure gamestop doesn't have a monopoly, but who's to stop them from taking as much as they can (at least for console games)?

yenola is right

No one. Same with any business. Of course some are bigger or more important, and they have more regulation. But in most cases, you can ask whatever, and it is up to the consumer to be intelligent and go somewhere more reasonable. GameStop is not an exclusive case.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2013, 01:06:05 AM by MegaScientifical »

sure gamestop doesn't have a monopoly, but who's to stop them from taking as much as they can (at least for console games)?
customers. nobody's going to buy games that are priced ridiculously, and few people will sell games for ridiculous prices

No one. Same with any business. Of course some are bigger or more important, and they have more regulation. But in most cases, you can ask whatever, and it is up to the consumer to be intelligent and go somewhere more reasonable. GameStop is not an exclusive case.
you act like the average consumer does go somewhere more reasonable, and as if there is anywhere more reasonable.

customers. nobody's going to buy games that are priced ridiculously, and few people will sell games for ridiculous prices
again, as if there is anywhere more reasonable that sells games that aren't priced ridiculously

you act like the average consumer does go somewhere more reasonable, and as if there is anywhere more reasonable.
again, as if there is anywhere more reasonable that sells games that aren't priced ridiculously

Steam?

Steam?
you can't talk about the pc game market for a few reasons:

1.  it's basically heavily taken by steam and partially by origin (inb4 "origin sux", everyone still has to use it for their beloved EA games so who gives a forget)
2.  there's no such thing as "used games" for PC.

strolled through gamestop in the mall nearby just for stuffs n giggles and looked at their PC collection.  full priced, barely a good selection, nothing special.

again, as if there is anywhere more reasonable that sells games that aren't priced ridiculously
the used price for Halo 3 on the Gamestop website is $8
not much
but, on amazon, the sellers it has go as low as $2

the used price for Halo 3 on the Gamestop website is $8
not much
but, on amazon, the sellers it has go as low as $2

"No case, just disk, a few scratches, not tested, no refunds" Is what I see for the CD games I look at from Amazon lol