Author Topic: COD vs BF4  (Read 4639 times)

ghosts wins
advanced fish ai hasn't been seen since 1996

Meh, IMO Star Wars is extremely overrated and just flat-out uninteresting. As for third person shooters, I say Uncharted is 50x better. Not to mention games where you can switch between 1st/3rd such as Arma.

However we are talking about two very competitive first person shooters that strive to go toe-and-toe, to which I say they both have their pros and cons. I believe Call of Duty's new class system is far superior and they have some phenomenal customization. Battlefield wins in every other aspect though. The new camos in Battlefield 4 definitely dwarf call of duty's now.

Those were pretty funny.

Its loving handicapped how you guys say BF is better then COD and COD is better the BF. You can't compare them! Now anyways Battlefront and Counter Strike beats both of these gay ass games.

Its loving handicapped how you guys say BF is better then COD and COD is better the BF. You can't compare them! Now anyways Battlefront and Counter Strike beats both of these gay ass games.
I hope that hypocrisy was intended.

Its loving handicapped how you guys say BF is better then COD and COD is better the BF. You can't compare them! Now anyways Battlefront and Counter Strike beats both of these gay ass games.
bf is a fps
cod is a fps
uh

Its loving handicapped how you guys say BF is better then COD and COD is better the BF. You can't compare them! Now anyways Battlefront and Counter Strike beats both of these gay ass games.
yes you can
they're both FPS
they both rely heavily on the multiplayer
they both take place in the present/near future
they both have weapon customization
ect
ect

bf is a fps
cod is a fps
uh
yes and blockland and minecraft both have blocks, are they the same game?

yes and blockland and minecraft both have blocks, are they the same game?
Even though you can classify both as sandbox games they're really two different genres.
BF3 and COD both share the base mechanic of being modern shooters.

yes you can
they're both FPS
they both rely heavily on the multiplayer
they both take place in the present/near future
they both have weapon customization
ect
ect
They both have different gameplay styles aswell as appealing to different audicences, COD is more fast pace and has more close quarters action, aswell as being more of a casual game, and BF4 has more of an open enviorment and slower paced gameplay with more strategy involved, also appealing to the "competitive" gamers. 

yes and blockland and minecraft both have blocks, are they the same game?

Except that both of them have different goals, where COD and Battlefield are basically the same, arcade shooters.

They both have different gameplay styles aswell as appealing to different audicences, COD is more fast pace and has more close quarters action, aswell as being more of a casual game, and BF4 has more of an open enviorment and slower paced gameplay with more strategy involved, also appealing to the "competitive" gamers. 
That's a horrid lie. BF3 has just as fast paced combat especially on Close Quarters maps and still manages to be 2x better than COD in that respect.

yes and blockland and minecraft both have blocks, are they the same game?
Oh jeez. Blockland and Minecraft are different genres, and he wasn't even saying anything close to them being the same game but that they were comparable. Please go away.

half-life 1 is way better than both of them combined

half-life 1 is way better than both of them combined
i found it really boring and i have tried to complete it 3 times and just cannot because of how boring it is