Author Topic: What happens if USA was nuked?  (Read 4863 times)

but he doesn't

if america was bombed with nuclear missiles, do you really think they would send troops over there just after it?
Not that, I just mean he shouldn't be calling someone stupid / telling them they have no idea what they are talking about when he obviously doesn't either.

Also, lets say if another country (for say Russia) fires a limited nuclear strike at us, they could send in troops with NBC (Nuclear Biological, and Chemical) suits to take control of whats left of the United States. Limited/Tactical Nuclear Warfare is possible to a certain extent but is 90% certain to turn into a all out war. Either way, my point still stands. They an use a limited nuclear strike to destroy key parts of the United States infrastructure and then launch the initial invasion soon after.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2013, 04:33:48 PM by Cut Glass »


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-ballistic_missile
Most United States anti-ballistic missiles are only fit to take out a intermediate or short range ballistic missile, Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles travel to fast for them to intercept, United States is still developing anti ballistic missiles to take down ICBM's, all tests have resulted in failure so far.

Also, lets say if another country (for say Russia) fires a limited nuclear strike at us, they could send in troops with NBC (Nuclear Biological, and Chemical) suits to take control of whats left of the United States. Limited/Tactical Nuclear Warfare is possible to a certain extent but is 90% certain to turn into a all out war. Either way, my point still stands. They an use a limited nuclear strike to destroy key parts of the United States infrastructure and then launch the initial invasion soon after.

However, the manpower it would take to do so would be easily seen.

Countries don't start building ten million member armies for defense

Nuclear weapons are humanity's greatest mistake

I'd probably drive into the sight of the explosion so I don't have to suffer from radioactivity.

id go insane having to wait if i knew it was gonna happen.

WW3 is not going to happen, the UN would be too prepared.

we'd fight back with rail guns, laser cannons and hydrogen bombs


WW3 is not going to happen, the UN would be too prepared.
What in the forget are you talking about?

we'd fight back with rail guns -In Development-, laser cannons -In Development- and hydrogen bombs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-14_Tomcat
The Delta Dart was the last dedicated interceptor, meaning the last one to fill ONLY the interception role. The F-14 was a multiple fighter.

the us and allies could shoot down thousands of nukes at once. our missile shielf is superior.

but ironically, even if we thwart our own nuclear destruction, we would still react by shooting our own.
so the world kinda loses either way lol
this lol

America being nuked, thats funny

this lol

America being nuked, thats funny
Not really considering it can happen.
Most United States anti-ballistic missiles are only fit to take out a intermediate or short range ballistic missile, Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles travel to fast for them to intercept, United States is still developing anti ballistic missiles to take down ICBM's, all tests have resulted in failure so far.

Well got the Iron Dome around Russia, ballistic missile ships in European waters and in the Mediterranean.

Well got the Iron Dome around Russia, ballistic missile ships in European waters and in the Mediterranean.
Most sites are not even constructed...?

Main Anti Balistic Missile of the United States is the RIM-161 Standard Missile 3. It CANNOT intercept ICBM's. Stop saying it can.
Quote from: Wikipedia
The RIM-161 Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) is a ship-based missile system used by the US Navy to intercept short- to intermediate-range ballistic missiles as a part of Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIM-161_Standard_Missile_3