Author Topic: so was forum user IUV ever proven a girl  (Read 1074 times)

I remember a drama topic quite a few months ago that somehow spiraled into something about IUV actually being a girl and trinick/slicksilver (I think it was him???) came in and said some stuff about how he had DOX'd her/he/it and had medical records for proof. was that ever confirmed or was anything else on that subject surfaced?

what
why would someone make a big deal out of someone pretending to be a guy, who was really a girl
was it opposite day or something????
wtf

what
why would someone make a big deal out of someone pretending to be a guy, who was really a girl
was it opposite day or something????
wtf

idk I'm just really curious if they ended up being a girl/boy


he was transgendered
pfft, sounds like a cop out awnser to me

pfft, sounds like a cop out awnser to me
"aha! you're not really a guy, female scum!"
"no! I'm trans, I swear!"
"I'm not gonna fall for your dirty tricks, woman, now get out before I buy you a game in return for nudes!"

Dotdotcircle, the famed investigateer adamantly believed IUV was a girl. He found records dating back over a decade of it identifying as female, found private yet unsecured medical records tied to it's email address confirming the use of a female-only medication, and a whole bunch of other circumstantial evidence. He never found anything directly conclusive, which means one thing is for sure: IUV has done a damn good job keeping its identity a secret. I'm talking paranoid level.


Dotdotcircle, the famed investigateer adamantly believed IUV was a girl. He found records dating back over a decade of it identifying as female, found private yet unsecured medical records tied to it's email address confirming the use of a female-only medication, and a whole bunch of other circumstantial evidence. He never found anything directly conclusive, which means one thing is for sure: IUV has done a damn good job keeping its identity a secret. I'm talking paranoid level.
why are you saying "it"

why are you saying "it"
Because if the gender is ambiguous the person is either referred to as masculine or neuter. He's referring to them as neuter as there's a chance they may not be male.

Because if the gender is ambiguous the person is either referred to as masculine or neuter. He's referring to them as neuter as there's a chance they may not be male.
isn't "it" still considered offensive?

why not just say they and them

gender ambiguous and unoffensive. perfect

isn't "it" still considered offensive?
That's up to the recipient. In terms of grammatical correctness, "it" goes where Slick put it.

"aha! you're not really a guy, female scum!"
"no! I'm trans, I swear!"
"I'm not gonna fall for your dirty tricks, woman, now get out before I buy you a game in return for nudes!"
That describes a lot of men here.
 :cookieMonster:

why not just say they and them

gender ambiguous and unoffensive. perfect
Because I intended on being offensive. IUV is a roostersucker.