Author Topic: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread  (Read 63876 times)

Hammereditor's story is pretty inconsistent and looks botched.
First quote:
Yes, I know my story appears inconsistent because I am not definitively blaming malware.
However, I'm saying that it's either malware or Pacnet.
Poor logic. One can be lying and the other telling the truth.
Thank you for not believing me as untruthful, just because Pacnet has no fingers pointed at him.

However, I'm saying that it's either malware or Pacnet.

Well we know it's not malware, so let's key revoke Pacnet.

My favorite thing about you is how stupid and easy to make fun of you are. Like everything about you is pathetic and laughable at this point, and you show up and try to wave your e-peen around but only serve to remind everyone why we don't like you.
I'm stupid because Hammereditor posted right before my post saying something different? I don't think you have enough intelligence to realize things like that.

What the forget are you even saying? Are you contradicting yourself or are you just bad at making thoughts into words?
Unlike you, I don't jump to conclusions. Defending Hammereditor from your stuffty conclusions does not mean I'm on his side.

On what planet does that make any kind of sense? If one of them did the hack and neither of them are fessing up to it or ratting the other out, you ban them both.
The question was about who did it, not about who gets banned. Don't evade the question.

However, I'm saying that it's either malware or Pacnet.
why dont you, like, tell us WHAT IS IS? you loving live with your brother, and you use your computer. TELL US WHICH, IF IT'S PACNET, YOU ARE A WITNESS! DON'T YOU SEE?

because you're being a little stuff.
But did I say anything bannable? I don't think so.

Also, you said "It could be me or Pacnet"

Why not just say "It was pacent, sorry, he forgeted me over"
Because Pacnet might backstab me in real life if I said anything too caustic about him.

Well we know it's not malware
You don't.
In about 30 minutes, I will finally be able to get to my computer, make Norton 360 scan for viruses, and post the results here.

did you just like... miss my post on purpose?

why dont you, like, tell us WHAT IS IS? you loving live with your brother, and you use your computer. TELL US WHICH, IF IT'S PACNET, YOU ARE A WITNESS! DON'T YOU SEE?
I was not home at the time of the attack.

did you just like... miss my post on purpose?
I did not. I just am at my phone, and can't post replies as quickly as you.

I'm stupid because Hammereditor posted right before my post saying something different? I don't think you have enough intelligence to realize things like that.

It's deliciously ironic that you're trying to insult my intelligence lol

Unlike you, I don't jump to conclusions. Defending Hammereditor from your stuffty conclusions does not mean I'm on his side.

No but it makes you an idiot.

The question was about who did it, not about who gets banned. Don't evade the question.

They're both equally culpable.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xu8AnJxI2LA&t=2m16s
lol

Because Pacnet might backstab me in real life if I said anything too caustic about him.

And you really think that's going to save you from retribution?
I can blame all my autistic behavior on my "brother" too if I want.

Is anyone going to believe me? No.

We should just make a poll on what to do.
  • Ban and revoke Hammereditor
  • Ban and revoke Pacnet
  • Ban and revoke them both
  • Do nothing
Except Hammer will probably make alternates and just vote on "Ban and revoke Pacnet" or "do nothing".

You don't.
In about 30 minutes, I will finally be able to get to my computer, make Norton 360 scan for viruses, and post the results here.

To think there's a possibility of malware being a factor in the attack on RTB is insane.

No but it makes you an idiot.
Really?

I'm sorry for caring about truth and accuracy; I forgot you hated them so much.

Really?

I'm sorry for caring about truth and accuracy; I forgot you hated them so much.

Says you.

26 pages in 3 days. Is it safe to assume that this will reach 100 pages?
because it honestly wouldn't surprise me..